SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by
olof ekbergh
on May 28, 2012 at 1:45:30 pm
I now find FCPX to be a great solution for our facility.
We used fcp7 but never as our main solution. M100 was always our main editor, with AE as our compositing tool, and we did most cc in M100 but often used Color XML round tripping with M100.
I tried FCPX when it first came out but it just seemed too buggy and sluggish. I kept trying it as each update came out. I really liked the DB aspect and I also actually really like the magnetic timeline. But the lack of proper monitoring and sluggish behavior kept us from adapting it.
I finally decided to try a new iMac, top of the line with everything maxed. Wow FCPX runs great on it and the Matrox MX02 runs perfectly.
I completed our last project on FCPX and as I was really getting into how it works I kept getting more impressed. I can do everything in one app now. The cc is really very good once you spend some time with it. Even the audio tools are decent, compression limit and EQ works quite well, even auto noise removal is not bad.
FCPX works great with EXcam and AF100 native formats, we always transcoded those before. This is a big time saver.
Our work is a mix of industrial training promo and safety videos. We also do commercials promoting tourism in the White Mountains, and a lot of WEB vids and kiosks for our clients. We also do some long form doc work.
I am now in the process of importing all our projects that we change and update on a yearly bases into FCPX. We do safety boating videos for a company that produces the safety courses for most of the states in the US. And they keep needing updates as laws change. The magnetic timeline makes these changes a breeze.
I think the biggest problem for us was that our 4 year old 8core MP's just were not fast enough. I am very happy with the low price of our new iMac and how quiet the TB RAID is, you no longer have to keep the SAS raid in another room to be able to edit.
I think Apple needs to make a big point of encouraging updated hardware with FCPX or editors will be disappointed in the performance. Personally I am very happy to see the end of the noisy tower computers and RAID I closures.
A new suite is now possible for very low price.
iMac $2,600.00
TB raid $1,600.00
MX02 or similar <1,000.00
FCPX etc. $500.00
SDI monitor $2,500.00
This is really amazing, compared to what this type of performance cost a few years ago. My first SD system cost almost $70,000.00. And a Betacam was $100,000.00+ back then. We are really seeing the democratization of video production, and I am all for it.
Yes lots more competition keeps you on your toes but there are also many more cients and outlets for good video.
Olof Ekbergh
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by alban egger on May 27, 2012 at 7:29:19 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Cherniack on May 27, 2012 at 8:50:45 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 27, 2012 at 11:44:12 pm
Mine Has Changed!
by John Davidson on May 28, 2012 at 2:41:40 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Mark Dobson on May 28, 2012 at 8:07:08 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 28, 2012 at 11:45:20 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 3:13:40 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Greg Andonian on May 28, 2012 at 5:04:17 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by olof ekbergh on May 28, 2012 at 1:45:30 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Shields on May 28, 2012 at 3:22:10 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Joseph Owens on May 28, 2012 at 9:13:09 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 28, 2012 at 9:43:02 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 4:04:05 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Liam Hall on May 28, 2012 at 1:22:11 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 28, 2012 at 5:45:04 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Liam Hall on May 28, 2012 at 7:04:06 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 28, 2012 at 7:06:10 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 28, 2012 at 8:34:14 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 28, 2012 at 9:25:58 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 28, 2012 at 9:46:08 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 28, 2012 at 9:54:52 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 4:54:46 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 4:14:23 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 29, 2012 at 5:49:25 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 4:13:41 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 29, 2012 at 4:21:23 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 4:39:40 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 4:53:16 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Liam Hall on May 28, 2012 at 9:05:07 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 28, 2012 at 9:07:59 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 28, 2012 at 11:25:03 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by John Davidson on May 28, 2012 at 11:39:49 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 29, 2012 at 12:40:48 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by John Davidson on May 29, 2012 at 12:42:56 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 29, 2012 at 12:50:53 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 29, 2012 at 1:31:29 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 4:06:31 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 29, 2012 at 4:25:33 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 4:57:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 29, 2012 at 12:27:26 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 28, 2012 at 8:29:18 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Liam Hall on May 28, 2012 at 10:51:03 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 2:21:35 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 29, 2012 at 2:28:18 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 29, 2012 at 3:10:05 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 29, 2012 at 3:14:50 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 29, 2012 at 3:30:54 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 29, 2012 at 4:29:03 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 29, 2012 at 4:52:52 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 4:18:59 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Liam Hall on May 29, 2012 at 3:03:07 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 29, 2012 at 3:22:57 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 4:32:48 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Liam Hall on May 29, 2012 at 6:49:06 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 7:13:02 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 29, 2012 at 7:32:37 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 7:58:49 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 29, 2012 at 8:12:09 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 29, 2012 at 8:26:12 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 29, 2012 at 8:34:01 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 29, 2012 at 8:39:35 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 29, 2012 at 8:57:28 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 8:29:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 29, 2012 at 8:52:21 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 9:04:08 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 29, 2012 at 9:23:14 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Erik Lundberg on May 31, 2012 at 4:57:18 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Mathieu Ghekiere on May 29, 2012 at 11:05:23 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Liam Hall on May 29, 2012 at 7:36:11 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 8:00:40 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 28, 2012 at 9:18:02 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Liam Hall on May 28, 2012 at 10:40:17 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Carsten Orlt on May 28, 2012 at 11:14:41 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 28, 2012 at 11:51:16 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 29, 2012 at 12:15:50 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Paul Neumann on May 29, 2012 at 1:00:52 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Liam Hall on May 29, 2012 at 7:47:19 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by tony west on May 29, 2012 at 1:50:25 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 29, 2012 at 2:01:34 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Liam Hall on May 29, 2012 at 2:39:09 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 6:10:20 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 29, 2012 at 2:39:04 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Liam Hall on May 29, 2012 at 3:11:50 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 29, 2012 at 3:31:11 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 29, 2012 at 3:56:14 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 29, 2012 at 4:03:49 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 29, 2012 at 4:14:54 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 6:51:12 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 29, 2012 at 6:53:05 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 29, 2012 at 7:16:48 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 8:12:13 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 29, 2012 at 8:32:58 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 8:45:22 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 8:51:34 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 29, 2012 at 8:52:29 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 9:01:53 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 8:45:50 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 29, 2012 at 9:20:36 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 9:25:31 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 30, 2012 at 1:06:10 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 30, 2012 at 2:56:30 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 30, 2012 at 6:43:57 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 31, 2012 at 12:16:47 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 29, 2012 at 7:40:29 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 29, 2012 at 7:49:52 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 29, 2012 at 8:02:27 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 8:19:08 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 29, 2012 at 8:22:29 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 8:29:52 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 8:46:49 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 29, 2012 at 9:08:56 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 29, 2012 at 9:18:16 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 29, 2012 at 9:38:37 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 29, 2012 at 9:43:12 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 29, 2012 at 10:08:55 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 29, 2012 at 10:17:24 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 29, 2012 at 10:25:05 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 29, 2012 at 10:28:30 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 29, 2012 at 10:38:24 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 30, 2012 at 12:32:07 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 30, 2012 at 1:00:07 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 30, 2012 at 1:13:22 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 30, 2012 at 1:59:20 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 30, 2012 at 6:03:02 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 29, 2012 at 8:15:41 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by tony west on May 29, 2012 at 10:33:34 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 30, 2012 at 12:51:06 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 30, 2012 at 6:06:48 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by tony west on May 30, 2012 at 9:08:38 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on Jun 5, 2012 at 5:28:07 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 30, 2012 at 12:21:29 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 30, 2012 at 12:34:45 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by TImothy Auld on May 30, 2012 at 12:43:01 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 30, 2012 at 5:19:57 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 30, 2012 at 5:52:38 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 30, 2012 at 6:21:33 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Franz Bieberkopf on May 29, 2012 at 1:33:26 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Franz Bieberkopf on May 29, 2012 at 1:38:14 am
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]