SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by
Tangier Clarke
on May 24, 2012 at 6:12:43 pm
In one way or another everyone's covered all I want to say, particularly Walter. I've dealt with the growing pains and still use FCP 7 alongside X. The first week of X's release I saw my editorial productivity skyrocket - no comparison. I could edit and organize faster in X. Within months FCP 7 felt old and lethargic. I recently downloaded PrP 6 and MC6. I ran back to both FCP 7 and eagerly want to cut on FCP X more.
I consider the scope of what Apple's been doing in recent years - Core Animation, Core Graphics, Core Audio, Core Data, GPU leveraging, cleaning and streaming code with OS updates and FCP [classic] updates, mobile devices and their desktop-software counterparts, buying, rebranding/repackaging, improving, feature-merging (Shake-Motion, Logic-Soundtrack), and the massive undertaking of AV foundation and frankly I think we're starting to see the fruits of a lot of labor that we hadn't yet had the chance to fully exploit; thank you 64-bit.
I follow the developers as they find hidden gems of FCP X yet to be "activated", it's color capabilities, the awesome relational database structure it uses and how that metadata will help us later (when more hooks are available to get it out) and I see a bright future for X. I do believe that there's "one more thing" perhaps we'll see this year or early next; either a feature or separate app.
Someone demoes PrP6 on a massively beefed-up system recently at an LA event and it occurred to me. Apple seldom demos (publicly) on a MacPro. We all know the MacPro's gonna shine. They demo on things like...wait for it...iMacs. That speaks volumes when you consider when you look at the performance based on their code, the core technologies, and what can be done on non-extended hardware.
My perception has changed since the release of X. It went from "this is fun, let me see how i can use it" to I want to cut everything in X now.
PrP6 is really nice, but it is very much like FCP7+ (and I mean that in a very positive way for Adobe).Though now I find myself not looking for a FCP 7 or anything like it. In my personal recent test, just a basic AVCHD (from Af100) open archive, edit, draw the thumbnails for the skimmer/hover, playback and skim/hover playback, transcode (to ProRes), etc., FCP X outperformed PrP6 by a huge margin on one of my older systems (Mac Pro 2x2.26 Quad-Core Intel Xeon/ 16 GB RAM/ ATI Radeon HD 5770/Blackmagic Multibridge Pro 2).
At the end of the day we'll vote with our dollars. FCP 7 still works for me. FCP X is increasingly working out for me. Cutting my first 4K RED project in it (ProRes of course for now). I am looking forward to checking out the new Smoke too.
Tangier
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 22, 2012 at 3:36:55 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 22, 2012 at 3:44:21 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 4:54:56 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 22, 2012 at 5:18:26 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by tony west on May 22, 2012 at 6:09:58 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by John Davidson on May 22, 2012 at 5:15:03 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Garber on May 22, 2012 at 5:36:23 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 5:58:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bret Williams on May 22, 2012 at 6:06:22 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 6:01:33 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Powell on May 22, 2012 at 6:12:37 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 6:27:20 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 6:42:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 7:13:13 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jim Giberti on May 22, 2012 at 7:37:49 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by TImothy Auld on May 22, 2012 at 8:18:40 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 22, 2012 at 8:48:51 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 9:27:59 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bret Williams on May 22, 2012 at 9:55:44 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 10:43:21 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 1:03:53 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 23, 2012 at 1:50:03 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:30:52 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 23, 2012 at 5:39:54 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jules bowman on May 23, 2012 at 8:50:58 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 23, 2012 at 11:03:26 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 24, 2012 at 12:24:31 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 24, 2012 at 1:36:17 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 1:41:22 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 24, 2012 at 3:14:30 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 24, 2012 at 3:18:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 24, 2012 at 3:29:55 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Hancock on May 24, 2012 at 7:22:57 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 25, 2012 at 3:16:26 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 24, 2012 at 3:42:42 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 3:51:31 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 24, 2012 at 4:22:27 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 3:00:08 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 3:40:07 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 24, 2012 at 6:13:14 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 7:21:11 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 25, 2012 at 3:07:10 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 28, 2012 at 5:38:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 3:58:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 29, 2012 at 4:14:12 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 29, 2012 at 4:21:55 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 4:05:25 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 24, 2012 at 4:52:36 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 5:01:28 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 10:37:38 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 23, 2012 at 2:31:22 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 23, 2012 at 12:01:41 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jules bowman on May 22, 2012 at 9:01:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 6:34:47 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 6:39:51 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 22, 2012 at 7:53:56 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 22, 2012 at 9:04:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 22, 2012 at 9:29:19 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 9:47:33 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 1:32:57 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 2:57:06 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 8:18:21 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jules bowman on May 23, 2012 at 8:57:38 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 10:05:30 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 6:25:03 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 6:48:20 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Tim Wilson on May 23, 2012 at 7:20:02 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 7:42:35 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 23, 2012 at 6:54:14 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 1:25:03 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 23, 2012 at 1:46:54 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:08:29 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 23, 2012 at 3:27:18 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 9:03:20 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 23, 2012 at 9:10:47 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 6:29:11 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 24, 2012 at 3:02:37 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 11:07:33 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 25, 2012 at 1:33:51 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 25, 2012 at 2:06:49 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 25, 2012 at 3:09:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 25, 2012 at 3:24:50 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 25, 2012 at 4:12:23 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 25, 2012 at 4:30:34 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 22, 2012 at 9:43:26 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 1:47:54 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 23, 2012 at 2:31:44 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:48:25 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 23, 2012 at 2:58:55 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 23, 2012 at 5:53:58 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 7:31:14 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 5:15:08 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 3:46:46 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Mitch Ives on May 23, 2012 at 5:29:28 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Tim Wilson on May 23, 2012 at 5:42:21 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 6:36:08 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Mitch Ives on May 23, 2012 at 6:39:53 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Fredy Schwerdtner on May 23, 2012 at 11:07:41 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 6:16:00 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 22, 2012 at 7:09:00 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Shane Ross on May 22, 2012 at 7:53:28 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 22, 2012 at 8:00:00 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 8:18:24 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 8:25:58 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 8:28:50 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Shane Ross on May 22, 2012 at 8:37:35 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Shane Ross on May 22, 2012 at 8:27:47 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 8:13:24 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 22, 2012 at 8:37:17 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bob Woodhead on May 22, 2012 at 9:56:11 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:46:44 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bob Woodhead on May 23, 2012 at 11:37:31 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 25, 2012 at 12:15:11 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 11:00:25 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:52:24 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by tony west on May 23, 2012 at 6:10:47 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 23, 2012 at 7:45:52 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by tony west on May 24, 2012 at 5:22:03 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bobby Mosca on May 22, 2012 at 8:37:45 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 22, 2012 at 9:19:18 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by TImothy Auld on May 22, 2012 at 9:27:15 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 9:49:58 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 22, 2012 at 10:07:47 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 10:31:01 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 22, 2012 at 11:06:55 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 11:31:29 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 22, 2012 at 11:53:20 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 23, 2012 at 12:04:33 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 23, 2012 at 12:51:35 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Powell on May 23, 2012 at 12:03:51 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jim Giberti on May 23, 2012 at 1:51:40 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 23, 2012 at 2:20:01 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Marcus Moore on May 23, 2012 at 3:23:23 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 4:33:07 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Marcus Moore on May 23, 2012 at 4:40:52 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 5:06:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Marcus Moore on May 23, 2012 at 5:31:48 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 23, 2012 at 6:07:59 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 23, 2012 at 10:47:52 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Marcus Moore on May 24, 2012 at 1:50:27 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 24, 2012 at 2:55:59 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 25, 2012 at 2:50:50 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 23, 2012 at 2:26:37 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 23, 2012 at 3:05:22 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by alban egger on May 23, 2012 at 6:33:48 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Powell on May 23, 2012 at 9:13:44 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by alban egger on May 23, 2012 at 4:06:40 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 23, 2012 at 11:01:34 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by alban egger on May 24, 2012 at 6:09:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Greg Andonian on May 23, 2012 at 7:33:23 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 8:57:00 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 3:11:29 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 23, 2012 at 12:02:30 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 23, 2012 at 3:10:40 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 6:42:04 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Mathieu Ghekiere on May 23, 2012 at 12:22:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Neil Goodman on May 23, 2012 at 3:09:32 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 23, 2012 at 5:59:05 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Rafael Amador on May 24, 2012 at 6:08:58 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by James Mortner on May 24, 2012 at 8:29:08 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 3:35:21 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Tangier Clarke on May 24, 2012 at 6:12:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 25, 2012 at 3:12:25 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Tangier Clarke on May 25, 2012 at 4:13:14 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Powell on May 24, 2012 at 5:55:12 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Eric Santiago on May 24, 2012 at 8:00:46 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Charlie Austin on May 27, 2012 at 2:55:50 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 27, 2012 at 10:23:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 27, 2012 at 4:34:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 27, 2012 at 4:55:07 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 27, 2012 at 11:56:25 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Charlie Austin on May 27, 2012 at 5:34:16 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 27, 2012 at 6:18:23 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by alban egger on May 27, 2012 at 7:36:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 28, 2012 at 4:38:54 am
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]