SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by
Walter Soyka
on May 23, 2012 at 6:07:59 am
[Marcus Moore]
" think it speaks to a larger, dare I say philosophical?, question of what a workstation is. You go back even 5 years and the processing advantage between a MacPro and an iMac was miles apart. Now you see demos of people working with 4K material on a MacBook Air via Thunderbolt."
I talk about this a lot when we discuss workstations here.
There's a distinction between computing power and throughput. You used to need a workstation to get both. Now, courtesy of Thunderbolt, you can pretty much get the throughput without the computing power.
Moore's law means that processing power per unit of price grows exponentially, but video requirements grow stepwise at a much lower rate. Computing power (capacity) has utterly outpaced our needs for video (demand). Straight editorial simply doesn't need workstation-class computing performance in 2012. Workstations have outgrown video editorial.
However, I think it's myopic to suggest this means Apple can reduce the relative computing power they offer on the desktop without affecting our industry. Thunderbolt is still a relatively narrow pipe when compared with server- or workstation-class PCIe, there are still applications with high RAM requirements, and there are still applications (especially compositing or 3D applications) that can soak up every cycle of processing power your machine can offer.
Expectations rise at the same rate as capabilities, so once we can deliver a better visual or a tighter turnaround, that becomes the new norm.
There is no such thing as enough processing power, and I think that if Apple only moves forward with throughput without corresponding advances in computing power on their desktop machines, they'll lose whatever portion of the high-end (read: high-expectation) markets adjacent to editorial that they have left.
Walter Soyka
Principal & Designer at
Keen Live
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
RenderBreak Blog
- What I'm thinking when my workstation's thinking
Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
+1
Current Message Thread:
After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 22, 2012 at 3:36:55 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 22, 2012 at 3:44:21 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 4:54:56 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 22, 2012 at 5:18:26 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by tony west on May 22, 2012 at 6:09:58 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by John Davidson on May 22, 2012 at 5:15:03 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Garber on May 22, 2012 at 5:36:23 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 5:58:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bret Williams on May 22, 2012 at 6:06:22 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 6:01:33 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Powell on May 22, 2012 at 6:12:37 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 6:27:20 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 6:42:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 7:13:13 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jim Giberti on May 22, 2012 at 7:37:49 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by TImothy Auld on May 22, 2012 at 8:18:40 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 22, 2012 at 8:48:51 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 9:27:59 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bret Williams on May 22, 2012 at 9:55:44 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 10:43:21 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 1:03:53 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 23, 2012 at 1:50:03 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:30:52 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 23, 2012 at 5:39:54 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jules bowman on May 23, 2012 at 8:50:58 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 23, 2012 at 11:03:26 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 24, 2012 at 12:24:31 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 24, 2012 at 1:36:17 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 1:41:22 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 24, 2012 at 3:14:30 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 24, 2012 at 3:18:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 24, 2012 at 3:29:55 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Hancock on May 24, 2012 at 7:22:57 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 25, 2012 at 3:16:26 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 24, 2012 at 3:42:42 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 3:51:31 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 24, 2012 at 4:22:27 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 3:00:08 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 3:40:07 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 24, 2012 at 6:13:14 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 7:21:11 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 25, 2012 at 3:07:10 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 28, 2012 at 5:38:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 3:58:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 29, 2012 at 4:14:12 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 29, 2012 at 4:21:55 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 4:05:25 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 24, 2012 at 4:52:36 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 5:01:28 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 10:37:38 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 23, 2012 at 2:31:22 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 23, 2012 at 12:01:41 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jules bowman on May 22, 2012 at 9:01:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 6:34:47 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 6:39:51 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 22, 2012 at 7:53:56 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 22, 2012 at 9:04:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 22, 2012 at 9:29:19 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 9:47:33 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 1:32:57 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 2:57:06 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 8:18:21 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jules bowman on May 23, 2012 at 8:57:38 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 10:05:30 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 6:25:03 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 6:48:20 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Tim Wilson on May 23, 2012 at 7:20:02 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 7:42:35 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 23, 2012 at 6:54:14 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 1:25:03 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 23, 2012 at 1:46:54 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:08:29 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 23, 2012 at 3:27:18 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 9:03:20 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 23, 2012 at 9:10:47 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 6:29:11 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 24, 2012 at 3:02:37 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 11:07:33 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 25, 2012 at 1:33:51 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 25, 2012 at 2:06:49 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 25, 2012 at 3:09:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 25, 2012 at 3:24:50 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 25, 2012 at 4:12:23 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 25, 2012 at 4:30:34 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 22, 2012 at 9:43:26 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 1:47:54 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 23, 2012 at 2:31:44 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:48:25 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 23, 2012 at 2:58:55 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 23, 2012 at 5:53:58 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 7:31:14 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 5:15:08 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 3:46:46 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Mitch Ives on May 23, 2012 at 5:29:28 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Tim Wilson on May 23, 2012 at 5:42:21 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 6:36:08 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Mitch Ives on May 23, 2012 at 6:39:53 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Fredy Schwerdtner on May 23, 2012 at 11:07:41 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 6:16:00 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 22, 2012 at 7:09:00 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Shane Ross on May 22, 2012 at 7:53:28 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 22, 2012 at 8:00:00 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 8:18:24 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 8:25:58 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 8:28:50 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Shane Ross on May 22, 2012 at 8:37:35 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Shane Ross on May 22, 2012 at 8:27:47 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 8:13:24 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 22, 2012 at 8:37:17 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bob Woodhead on May 22, 2012 at 9:56:11 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:46:44 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bob Woodhead on May 23, 2012 at 11:37:31 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 25, 2012 at 12:15:11 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 11:00:25 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:52:24 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by tony west on May 23, 2012 at 6:10:47 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 23, 2012 at 7:45:52 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by tony west on May 24, 2012 at 5:22:03 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bobby Mosca on May 22, 2012 at 8:37:45 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 22, 2012 at 9:19:18 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by TImothy Auld on May 22, 2012 at 9:27:15 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 9:49:58 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 22, 2012 at 10:07:47 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 10:31:01 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 22, 2012 at 11:06:55 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 11:31:29 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 22, 2012 at 11:53:20 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 23, 2012 at 12:04:33 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 23, 2012 at 12:51:35 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Powell on May 23, 2012 at 12:03:51 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jim Giberti on May 23, 2012 at 1:51:40 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 23, 2012 at 2:20:01 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Marcus Moore on May 23, 2012 at 3:23:23 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 4:33:07 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Marcus Moore on May 23, 2012 at 4:40:52 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 5:06:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Marcus Moore on May 23, 2012 at 5:31:48 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 23, 2012 at 6:07:59 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 23, 2012 at 10:47:52 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Marcus Moore on May 24, 2012 at 1:50:27 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 24, 2012 at 2:55:59 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 25, 2012 at 2:50:50 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 23, 2012 at 2:26:37 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 23, 2012 at 3:05:22 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by alban egger on May 23, 2012 at 6:33:48 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Powell on May 23, 2012 at 9:13:44 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by alban egger on May 23, 2012 at 4:06:40 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 23, 2012 at 11:01:34 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by alban egger on May 24, 2012 at 6:09:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Greg Andonian on May 23, 2012 at 7:33:23 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 8:57:00 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 3:11:29 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 23, 2012 at 12:02:30 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 23, 2012 at 3:10:40 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 6:42:04 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Mathieu Ghekiere on May 23, 2012 at 12:22:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Neil Goodman on May 23, 2012 at 3:09:32 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 23, 2012 at 5:59:05 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Rafael Amador on May 24, 2012 at 6:08:58 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by James Mortner on May 24, 2012 at 8:29:08 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 3:35:21 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Tangier Clarke on May 24, 2012 at 6:12:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 25, 2012 at 3:12:25 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Tangier Clarke on May 25, 2012 at 4:13:14 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Powell on May 24, 2012 at 5:55:12 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Eric Santiago on May 24, 2012 at 8:00:46 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Charlie Austin on May 27, 2012 at 2:55:50 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 27, 2012 at 10:23:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 27, 2012 at 4:34:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 27, 2012 at 4:55:07 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 27, 2012 at 11:56:25 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Charlie Austin on May 27, 2012 at 5:34:16 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 27, 2012 at 6:18:23 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by alban egger on May 27, 2012 at 7:36:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 28, 2012 at 4:38:54 am
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]