SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by
Andy Neil
on May 22, 2012 at 9:43:26 pm
[Bill Davis]
"The "stigma" will last precisely until somebody does something different enough and cool enough with it and that supplants the old meme."
[Bill Davis]
"If X on a MacBook Pro satisfies an editor who wants to cut their extreme skiing GoPro clips from fireside at the chalet - and comes to understand that with proper planning, they can turn out a killer promo video for their boss and upload it to the web between drinks - then game over."
I think you're overstating it a bit. My stigma comment wasn't tied to whether or not an individual finds it useful for their work. I was speaking specifically for post facilities who buy hundreds of seats and do the bulk of TV and film editing. FCP7 has a pretty significant presence in post here in LA. Shops like Bunim-Murray have already moved away from it and in all the other FCP shops that I've been to and talked with, they have been vacillating on where they might go, but most aren't even considering FCPX as a possibility. Even if they don't plan on upgrading for a year or so. And why is that? The most common answer I get is that they don't know where FCPX is headed (fair enough), but there is also a distrust of Apple. No facility's manager wants to commit to FCPX only to have Apple pull the rug out from under them again.
Now these opinions are not my own. I'm a pretty big supporter of the current FCPX, and I'm confident that it's updates are heading in the right direction. But I also don't have a hundred seats to consider. Nor do I have post shop owners who hold the purse strings asking me to justify why their company should continue with Apple after they just EOL'd their entire facility. This is the stigma to which I'm referring. This will take more time than a year to blow over.
As Shane mentioned, FCPX (despite the name) cannot build upon the reputation of FCP7. No one who is in the position of purchasing equipment and software for an entire building is thinking of X as an upgrade from 7. That's just the way it is.
I like X. I think it's great and I have more fun editing on it than on Avid, or FCP7 or Premiere. In another year, it's going to be solid. In 2 more, I suspect it'll be one of the best out there. But it'll take at least that long to get post houses who've listened to all the criticism to even consider it. Aside from the outliers of course who are working closely with Apple right now.
It's too bad. The show I'm working on right now could really benefit from it.
Andy
http://www.timesavertutorials.com
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 22, 2012 at 3:36:55 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 22, 2012 at 3:44:21 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 4:54:56 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 22, 2012 at 5:18:26 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by tony west on May 22, 2012 at 6:09:58 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by John Davidson on May 22, 2012 at 5:15:03 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Garber on May 22, 2012 at 5:36:23 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 5:58:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bret Williams on May 22, 2012 at 6:06:22 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 6:01:33 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Powell on May 22, 2012 at 6:12:37 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 6:27:20 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 6:42:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 7:13:13 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jim Giberti on May 22, 2012 at 7:37:49 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by TImothy Auld on May 22, 2012 at 8:18:40 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 22, 2012 at 8:48:51 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 9:27:59 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bret Williams on May 22, 2012 at 9:55:44 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 10:43:21 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 1:03:53 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 23, 2012 at 1:50:03 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:30:52 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 23, 2012 at 5:39:54 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jules bowman on May 23, 2012 at 8:50:58 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 23, 2012 at 11:03:26 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 24, 2012 at 12:24:31 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 24, 2012 at 1:36:17 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 1:41:22 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 24, 2012 at 3:14:30 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 24, 2012 at 3:18:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 24, 2012 at 3:29:55 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Hancock on May 24, 2012 at 7:22:57 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 25, 2012 at 3:16:26 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 24, 2012 at 3:42:42 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 3:51:31 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 24, 2012 at 4:22:27 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 3:00:08 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 3:40:07 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 24, 2012 at 6:13:14 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 7:21:11 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 25, 2012 at 3:07:10 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 28, 2012 at 5:38:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 29, 2012 at 3:58:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 29, 2012 at 4:14:12 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 29, 2012 at 4:21:55 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 4:05:25 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 24, 2012 at 4:52:36 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 5:01:28 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 10:37:38 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 23, 2012 at 2:31:22 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Lawrence on May 23, 2012 at 12:01:41 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jules bowman on May 22, 2012 at 9:01:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 6:34:47 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 6:39:51 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 22, 2012 at 7:53:56 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 22, 2012 at 9:04:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 22, 2012 at 9:29:19 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 9:47:33 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 1:32:57 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 2:57:06 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 8:18:21 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jules bowman on May 23, 2012 at 8:57:38 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 10:05:30 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 6:25:03 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 6:48:20 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Tim Wilson on May 23, 2012 at 7:20:02 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 7:42:35 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 23, 2012 at 6:54:14 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 1:25:03 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 23, 2012 at 1:46:54 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:08:29 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 23, 2012 at 3:27:18 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 9:03:20 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 23, 2012 at 9:10:47 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 6:29:11 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 24, 2012 at 3:02:37 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 24, 2012 at 11:07:33 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 25, 2012 at 1:33:51 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 25, 2012 at 2:06:49 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 25, 2012 at 3:09:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 25, 2012 at 3:24:50 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 25, 2012 at 4:12:23 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 25, 2012 at 4:30:34 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 22, 2012 at 9:43:26 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 1:47:54 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 23, 2012 at 2:31:44 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:48:25 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 23, 2012 at 2:58:55 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 23, 2012 at 5:53:58 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 7:31:14 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 5:15:08 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 3:46:46 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Mitch Ives on May 23, 2012 at 5:29:28 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Tim Wilson on May 23, 2012 at 5:42:21 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 6:36:08 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Mitch Ives on May 23, 2012 at 6:39:53 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Fredy Schwerdtner on May 23, 2012 at 11:07:41 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 6:16:00 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 22, 2012 at 7:09:00 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Shane Ross on May 22, 2012 at 7:53:28 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 22, 2012 at 8:00:00 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 8:18:24 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 8:25:58 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 8:28:50 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Shane Ross on May 22, 2012 at 8:37:35 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Shane Ross on May 22, 2012 at 8:27:47 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 8:13:24 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 22, 2012 at 8:37:17 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bob Woodhead on May 22, 2012 at 9:56:11 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:46:44 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bob Woodhead on May 23, 2012 at 11:37:31 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 25, 2012 at 12:15:11 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 22, 2012 at 11:00:25 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 2:52:24 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by tony west on May 23, 2012 at 6:10:47 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 23, 2012 at 7:45:52 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by tony west on May 24, 2012 at 5:22:03 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bobby Mosca on May 22, 2012 at 8:37:45 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Michael Gissing on May 22, 2012 at 9:19:18 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by TImothy Auld on May 22, 2012 at 9:27:15 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 22, 2012 at 9:49:58 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 22, 2012 at 10:07:47 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 10:31:01 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 22, 2012 at 11:06:55 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 11:31:29 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 22, 2012 at 11:53:20 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 23, 2012 at 12:04:33 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 23, 2012 at 12:51:35 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Powell on May 23, 2012 at 12:03:51 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jim Giberti on May 23, 2012 at 1:51:40 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 23, 2012 at 2:20:01 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Marcus Moore on May 23, 2012 at 3:23:23 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 4:33:07 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Marcus Moore on May 23, 2012 at 4:40:52 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 23, 2012 at 5:06:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Marcus Moore on May 23, 2012 at 5:31:48 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Walter Soyka on May 23, 2012 at 6:07:59 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 23, 2012 at 10:47:52 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Marcus Moore on May 24, 2012 at 1:50:27 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 24, 2012 at 2:55:59 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 25, 2012 at 2:50:50 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 23, 2012 at 2:26:37 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Clint Wardlow on May 23, 2012 at 3:05:22 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by alban egger on May 23, 2012 at 6:33:48 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Powell on May 23, 2012 at 9:13:44 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by alban egger on May 23, 2012 at 4:06:40 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 23, 2012 at 11:01:34 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by alban egger on May 24, 2012 at 6:09:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Greg Andonian on May 23, 2012 at 7:33:23 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 8:57:00 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 3:11:29 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Jeremy Garchow on May 23, 2012 at 12:02:30 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andy Neil on May 23, 2012 at 3:10:40 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Bill Davis on May 23, 2012 at 6:42:04 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Mathieu Ghekiere on May 23, 2012 at 12:22:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Neil Goodman on May 23, 2012 at 3:09:32 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Andrew Kimery on May 23, 2012 at 5:59:05 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Rafael Amador on May 24, 2012 at 6:08:58 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by James Mortner on May 24, 2012 at 8:29:08 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Richard Herd on May 24, 2012 at 3:35:21 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Tangier Clarke on May 24, 2012 at 6:12:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Herb Sevush on May 25, 2012 at 3:12:25 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Tangier Clarke on May 25, 2012 at 4:13:14 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by David Powell on May 24, 2012 at 5:55:12 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Eric Santiago on May 24, 2012 at 8:00:46 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Charlie Austin on May 27, 2012 at 2:55:50 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 27, 2012 at 10:23:36 am
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 27, 2012 at 4:34:39 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Steve Connor on May 27, 2012 at 4:55:07 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Chris Harlan on May 27, 2012 at 11:56:25 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Charlie Austin on May 27, 2012 at 5:34:16 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 27, 2012 at 6:18:23 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by alban egger on May 27, 2012 at 7:36:43 pm
Re: After a year has perception of FCPX changed?
by Craig Seeman on May 28, 2012 at 4:38:54 am
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]