Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:HomeFCP ForumFCP XFCPX TechniquesFCP TutorialsFC ServerBasics ForumTrainingPodcastFAQ

Re: Editing scenario

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Share on Facebook
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Jeremy GarchowRe: Editing scenario
by on May 14, 2012 at 6:57:40 pm

[Walter Soyka] "However, I don't see a solution to Oliver's issue here"

You see a problem? I guess I'm wondering how this can't be done in X, or changed in X.

[Walter Soyka] "I think the foundation of the app is the stuff we've seen early. FCPX is totally file-based; why should SAN locations be a hard, foundational item?"

Why shouldn't they. They work completely differently from the rest of the application, and have one vague reference in the manual. Think it's complete?

Project sharing right in the app would be impressive, that also takes some gear. My feeling is it's not there yet, but my hunch is that it's planned.

[Walter Soyka] "I don't think DL ever suggested limiting it to two. Multiple primary storylines gives you all the advantages of tracks (if you want them) and all the advantages of the magnetic timeline (if you want that).

It'd be better than going back to tracks (by adding optional magnetism), and it wouldn't take anything away from the magnetic timeline."


I guess it seems unnecessary. If you control the primary, you control time.


Posts IndexRead Thread
Reply   Like  
Share on Facebook


Current Message Thread:




LOGIN TO REPLY



FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINESTOCKYARDVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2013 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]