Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX.

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX.
by Logan Kelsey on Apr 25, 2012 at 5:22:55 pm

[Kevin Zimmerman] "How do you deal with the one edit per project architecture of FCPX? I think there are many, many issues to spiral out of control over with FCPX, but this framework that Apple is created — where a project IS a single timeline, and therefore IS a single cut — baffles me. And I have no idea how I would work around it."

I just create folders in the Project library for each job. Versioning is done by duplicating the Project (timeline) and re-naming. Pretty simple.

Cheers,
Logan

Vertical Online
http://www.verticalonline.com

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Kevin Zimmerman on Apr 25, 2012 at 4:28:42 pm
- Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Craig Seeman on Apr 25, 2012 at 4:38:20 pm
  - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Craig Seeman on Apr 25, 2012 at 5:16:57 pm
    - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Jason Porthouse on Apr 25, 2012 at 5:32:02 pm
  - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Bret Williams on Apr 25, 2012 at 5:25:20 pm
- Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Logan Kelsey on Apr 25, 2012 at 5:22:55 pm
- Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Richard Herd on Apr 25, 2012 at 5:33:55 pm
- Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Jim Giberti on Apr 25, 2012 at 6:11:06 pm
  - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by alban egger on Apr 25, 2012 at 6:44:19 pm
- Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by John Davidson on Apr 25, 2012 at 6:37:18 pm
  - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Oliver Peters on Apr 25, 2012 at 9:01:31 pm
    - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Bill Davis on Apr 25, 2012 at 9:52:38 pm
      - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Oliver Peters on Apr 25, 2012 at 10:17:29 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Bill Davis on Apr 26, 2012 at 1:32:42 am
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Oliver Peters on Apr 26, 2012 at 2:28:31 am
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Bill Davis on Apr 26, 2012 at 3:37:45 am
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Oliver Peters on Apr 26, 2012 at 1:10:18 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Craig Seeman on Apr 26, 2012 at 2:41:37 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Oliver Peters on Apr 26, 2012 at 2:46:04 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Craig Seeman on Apr 26, 2012 at 3:14:51 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Oliver Peters on Apr 26, 2012 at 5:53:19 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Richard Herd on Apr 26, 2012 at 4:47:02 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 26, 2012 at 4:58:46 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Richard Herd on Apr 26, 2012 at 7:44:44 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 26, 2012 at 7:56:40 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Richard Herd on Apr 26, 2012 at 8:02:55 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 26, 2012 at 8:09:49 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Mark Hollander on May 11, 2012 at 2:55:40 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Jeremy Garchow on May 11, 2012 at 3:42:50 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Mark Bein on Apr 26, 2012 at 2:36:35 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Oliver Peters on Apr 26, 2012 at 2:38:45 pm
    - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Thomas Frank on Apr 25, 2012 at 9:57:02 pm
      - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 25, 2012 at 11:33:44 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Andrew Richards on Apr 26, 2012 at 4:22:24 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Bill Davis on Apr 26, 2012 at 6:40:21 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Andrew Richards on Apr 26, 2012 at 7:06:58 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 26, 2012 at 7:30:57 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Jim Giberti on Apr 26, 2012 at 8:08:05 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 26, 2012 at 8:48:37 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Thomas Frank on Apr 26, 2012 at 5:39:46 pm
    - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by tony west on Apr 25, 2012 at 10:35:10 pm
      - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Rob Mackintosh on Apr 26, 2012 at 1:12:08 am
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Bill Davis on Apr 26, 2012 at 1:52:22 am
    - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 26, 2012 at 4:04:11 am
      - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Oliver Peters on Apr 26, 2012 at 1:23:09 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 26, 2012 at 3:19:33 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Oliver Peters on Apr 26, 2012 at 6:07:31 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 26, 2012 at 6:24:57 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Oliver Peters on Apr 26, 2012 at 6:29:57 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Andrew Richards on Apr 26, 2012 at 8:12:51 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 26, 2012 at 8:16:38 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Andrew Richards on Apr 26, 2012 at 8:20:54 pm
- Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Tony Sarafoski on Apr 26, 2012 at 2:24:56 am
  - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Bill Davis on Apr 26, 2012 at 3:42:53 am
    - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Tony Sarafoski on Apr 26, 2012 at 4:03:58 am
      - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Tony Sarafoski on Apr 26, 2012 at 4:07:28 am
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Bill Davis on Apr 26, 2012 at 6:36:35 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Craig Seeman on Apr 26, 2012 at 6:52:14 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 26, 2012 at 6:58:48 pm
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Tony Sarafoski on Apr 27, 2012 at 1:13:50 am
        Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Jason Porthouse on Apr 27, 2012 at 9:44:19 am
- Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by John Fromstein on Apr 26, 2012 at 2:25:23 pm
  - Re: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX. by Craig Seeman on Apr 26, 2012 at 2:46:45 pm


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS