Re: One year later...

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: One year later...
by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:47:26 pm

[Chris Kenny] "everything is going to end up getting fed into some color grading system that isn't part of Adobe's ecosystem in the end anyway."

[Chris Kenny] "
Yes, but again, a lot of production workflows aren't the sort of end-to-end-under-one-roof affairs that make this kind of integration work. Often when an indie feature starts cutting, nobody on the production has any clue what facility will be grading the project or what software they'll be using, and the offline editor wouldn't pick a particular NLE just to make things easier for the online facility even if they did know."

My point was to correct a potential thought that Adobe does not have color grading as a part of our ecosystem. Indeed we DO have a color grading application. That was all. I get your point about not necessarily having dedicated workflows in types of production and I will not debate the correctness of it. ;-)

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:47:07 am
- Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:14:50 am
- Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:20:04 am
  - Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:57:18 am
  - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 1:50:26 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:32 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:13:30 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:39:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:43:08 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:17:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:30:59 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:58:28 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:31:58 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:00:49 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:57:15 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:36:37 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:30 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:24:44 pm
        Re: One year later... by Greg Andonian on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:45:54 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:00:55 am
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:10:06 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:14:05 am
        Re: One year later... by Mitch Ives on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:09:58 pm
        Re: One year later... by Paul Nordin on Apr 21, 2012 at 10:30:40 pm
        Re: One year later... by Mitch Ives on Apr 22, 2012 at 5:42:19 am
    - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:23:21 pm
        Re: One year later... by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:29:14 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:40:49 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:07:00 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:51:23 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:37:17 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:37:07 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:41:22 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:23:17 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:15:11 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:25:41 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:31:23 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Chris Harlan on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:08:41 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:06:35 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:04:43 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:33:29 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:49:25 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:09:25 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:30:08 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:58 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:20:28 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:53:03 am
        Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:01:44 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:49 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:05:32 pm
        Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:23:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:27:35 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:40:23 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:48:18 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:28:54 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:26:21 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:56:57 pm
- Re: One year later... by Lemur Hayop on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:43:07 am
  - Re: One year later... by Shane Ross on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:28 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:44:13 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:47:26 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:47:23 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:50:33 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:18:30 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:11:19 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:34:38 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:07:45 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:15:48 am
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:04:26 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:25:54 pm
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:55:27 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:03:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:47:26 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:30:14 am
        Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:39:27 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:50:04 am
        Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:29:09 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:38:00 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:47:45 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:12:40 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:05:55 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Shane Ross on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:57:16 pm
        Re: One year later... by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:05:36 pm
        Re: One year later... by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:45:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:06:07 pm
        Re: One year later... by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:59:31 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:16:54 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:09:02 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:17:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:11:07 am
- Re: One year later... by tony west on Apr 20, 2012 at 12:58:44 pm
  - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:22:17 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:08:28 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:49:41 pm
        Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:06:52 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:56:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:12:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:46:19 am
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:44:02 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:52:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:12:03 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:00 pm
- Re: One year later... by John Christie on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:28:14 pm
  - Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:56:47 pm
    - Re: One year later... by David Lawrence on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:19:27 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:42 pm
- Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:54:05 am
  - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:42:29 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:48:55 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:54:31 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:55:45 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:35 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:07:27 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:16:47 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:26:15 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 9:36:18 pm


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS