SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: One year later...
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: One year later...
by
Dennis Radeke
on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:04:26 pm
[Chris Kenny]
"Adobe wouldn't suffer all that much without Premiere. After all, it hasn't been taken very seriously to date, and they've been doing just fine. It's not clear how many additional copies of Creative Suite Adobe can even sell by improving Premiere. For instance, if we decided to migrate to Premiere here, it would result in zero additional sales for Adobe, as the systems we'd use it on already have Creative Suite licenses which were purchased to get Photoshop/Illustrator/AE/Encore. This is probably true for a lot of potential Premiere users."
I think many people miss what I consider to be the main point - namely the workflow of Production Premium in its entirety. In this case, Premiere Pro is the 'hub' application - where things like After Effects, Photoshop and others feed into the main organizational, story-telling tool.
From a business side, lacking a serious NLE client in the suite WOULD hurt sales because it would be incomplete. While Avid, FCP, et al users wouldn't be affected, there are many MANY who would.
Your statement of using Premiere Pro would increase Adobe sales by zero is true for you and others, but for many larger organizations who are determining which NLE to use in the future, they have different groups like graphics vs. editorial that would result in new seats. As a person who primarily focuses on broadcast and large media companies, I've seen many different variations of this over the last couple of years.
http://adobe.ly/yE60YD
The above is a statement of 2010's growth in video - prior to FCP X. I can tell you that our growth for 2011 with FCP X out in the wild wasn't too bad either. ;-) That growth had to come from somewhere and I would tell you that it's my personal belief that it comes from a complete suite of tools and workflow that are most compelling to those users who purchased Production Premium in the last two years.
While you may dismiss Premiere Pro (and that is your prerogative) , there are evidently a number of people who are taking Premiere Pro seriously in the pro market.
Respectfully,
Dennis - Adobe guy
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
One year later...
by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:47:07 am
Re: One year later...
by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:14:50 am
Re: One year later...
by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:20:04 am
Re: One year later...
by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:57:18 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 1:50:26 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:32 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:13:30 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:39:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:43:08 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:17:05 pm
Re: One year later...
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:30:59 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:58:28 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:31:58 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:00:49 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:57:15 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:36:37 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:30 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:24:44 pm
Re: One year later...
by Greg Andonian on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:45:54 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:00:55 am
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:10:06 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:14:05 am
Re: One year later...
by Mitch Ives on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:09:58 pm
Re: One year later...
by Paul Nordin on Apr 21, 2012 at 10:30:40 pm
Re: One year later...
by Mitch Ives on Apr 22, 2012 at 5:42:19 am
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:23:21 pm
Re: One year later...
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:29:14 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:40:49 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:07:00 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:51:23 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:37:17 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:37:07 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:41:22 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:23:17 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:15:11 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:25:41 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:31:23 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Chris Harlan on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:08:41 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:06:35 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:04:43 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:33:29 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:49:25 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:09:25 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:30:08 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:58 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:20:28 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:53:03 am
Re: One year later...
by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:01:44 pm
Re: One year later...
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:49 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:05:32 pm
Re: One year later...
by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:23:38 pm
Re: One year later...
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:27:35 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:40:23 pm
Re: One year later...
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:48:18 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:28:54 pm
Re: One year later...
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:26:21 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:56:57 pm
Re: One year later...
by Lemur Hayop on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:43:07 am
Re: One year later...
by Shane Ross on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:28 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:44:13 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:47:26 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:47:23 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:50:33 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:18:30 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:11:19 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:34:38 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:07:45 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:15:48 am
Re: One year later...
by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:04:26 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:25:54 pm
Re: One year later...
by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:55:27 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:03:38 pm
Re: One year later...
by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:47:26 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:30:14 am
Re: One year later...
by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:39:27 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:50:04 am
Re: One year later...
by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:29:09 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:38:00 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:47:45 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:12:40 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:05:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Shane Ross on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:57:16 pm
Re: One year later...
by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:05:36 pm
Re: One year later...
by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:45:05 pm
Re: One year later...
by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:06:07 pm
Re: One year later...
by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:59:31 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:16:54 pm
Re: One year later...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:09:02 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:17:38 pm
Re: One year later...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:11:07 am
Re: One year later...
by tony west on Apr 20, 2012 at 12:58:44 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:22:17 pm
Re: One year later...
by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:08:28 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:49:41 pm
Re: One year later...
by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:06:52 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:56:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:12:05 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:46:19 am
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:44:02 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:52:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:12:03 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:00 pm
Re: One year later...
by John Christie on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:28:14 pm
Re: One year later...
by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:56:47 pm
Re: One year later...
by David Lawrence on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:19:27 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:42 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:54:05 am
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:42:29 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:48:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:54:31 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:55:45 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:35 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:07:27 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:16:47 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:26:15 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 9:36:18 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]