SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: One year later...
COW Forums
:
Adobe SpeedGrade
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: One year later...
by
Andrew Kimery
on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:18:30 am
[Chris Kenny]
"If this is true, it stands to reason that if Apple's focus managed to produce a tool that met the needs of high-end users last time around, there's no reason to believe it won't do so again."
When/if it does how many of the high-end users are going to be the market to switch NLEs... again? And why toss the baby out with the bathwater on the rebuild if that's a market you want to keep? If FCPX didn't ship with Import from iMovie or Share to CNN iReporter I don't think anyone would've raised a fuss over those missing features at launch.
For a long time I've wondered about Apple's commitment to the higher end of the market. They buy Shake, they kill Shake. They make an exclusive deal w/RED and they do nothing with it. Color, Final Cut Server... it's like Apple wants that feather in their cap but they don't want to do the demanding, end-user-centric work in order to get it. Ron Brinkman even said that when Apple purchased Shake all user input was basically severed.
I'll try and find the link, but I remember reading an interview w/one of the guys that worked on FCP during the early days (like v1.0 early days) and he was surprised when the project lead said the goal was to get Avid. Obviously they couldn't go from nothing to king of the hill over night but that was the long term goal. To go toe to toe with Avid.
Maybe that still is the goal but they are going to do it by building a more profitable business as opposed to building a better product. ;)
For better or for worse Avid and Adobe need higher-end users so, as long as there is competition, those companies will cater to those higher-end users. Apple, for better or for worse, doesn't need higher-end users so they'll keep doing whatever it is they want to keep doing. If higher-end users like it, I'm sure Apple will be glad to sell it to them. If higher-end users don't like it I'm sure Apple will be glad to sell to the wider market that does.
-Andrew
2.9 GHz 8-core (4,1), FCP 7.0.3, 10.6.6
Blackmagic Multibridge Eclipse (7.9.5)
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
One year later...
by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:47:07 am
Re: One year later...
by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:14:50 am
Re: One year later...
by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:20:04 am
Re: One year later...
by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:57:18 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 1:50:26 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:32 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:13:30 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:39:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:43:08 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:17:05 pm
Re: One year later...
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:30:59 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:58:28 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:31:58 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:00:49 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:57:15 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:36:37 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:30 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:24:44 pm
Re: One year later...
by Greg Andonian on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:45:54 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:00:55 am
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:10:06 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:14:05 am
Re: One year later...
by Mitch Ives on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:09:58 pm
Re: One year later...
by Paul Nordin on Apr 21, 2012 at 10:30:40 pm
Re: One year later...
by Mitch Ives on Apr 22, 2012 at 5:42:19 am
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:23:21 pm
Re: One year later...
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:29:14 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:40:49 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:07:00 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:51:23 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:37:17 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:37:07 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:41:22 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:23:17 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:15:11 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:25:41 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:31:23 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Chris Harlan on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:08:41 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:06:35 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:04:43 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:33:29 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:49:25 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:09:25 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:30:08 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:58 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:20:28 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:53:03 am
Re: One year later...
by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:01:44 pm
Re: One year later...
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:49 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:05:32 pm
Re: One year later...
by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:23:38 pm
Re: One year later...
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:27:35 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:40:23 pm
Re: One year later...
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:48:18 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:28:54 pm
Re: One year later...
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:26:21 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:56:57 pm
Re: One year later...
by Lemur Hayop on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:43:07 am
Re: One year later...
by Shane Ross on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:28 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:44:13 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:47:26 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:47:23 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:50:33 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:18:30 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:11:19 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:34:38 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:07:45 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:15:48 am
Re: One year later...
by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:04:26 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:25:54 pm
Re: One year later...
by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:55:27 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:03:38 pm
Re: One year later...
by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:47:26 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:30:14 am
Re: One year later...
by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:39:27 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:50:04 am
Re: One year later...
by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:29:09 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:38:00 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:47:45 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:12:40 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:05:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Shane Ross on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:57:16 pm
Re: One year later...
by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:05:36 pm
Re: One year later...
by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:45:05 pm
Re: One year later...
by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:06:07 pm
Re: One year later...
by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:59:31 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:16:54 pm
Re: One year later...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:09:02 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:17:38 pm
Re: One year later...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:11:07 am
Re: One year later...
by tony west on Apr 20, 2012 at 12:58:44 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:22:17 pm
Re: One year later...
by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:08:28 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:49:41 pm
Re: One year later...
by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:06:52 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:56:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:12:05 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:46:19 am
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:44:02 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:52:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:12:03 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:00 pm
Re: One year later...
by John Christie on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:28:14 pm
Re: One year later...
by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:56:47 pm
Re: One year later...
by David Lawrence on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:19:27 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:42 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:54:05 am
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:42:29 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:48:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:54:31 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:55:45 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:35 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:07:27 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:16:47 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:26:15 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 9:36:18 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]