SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
FEATURES
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Podcast
FAQ
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by
Aindreas Gallagher
on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:20:28 pm
[Jeremy Garchow]
"Adobe's communication is commendable.... Can't wait to see what they do with it."
I think one can see pretty clearly what they have done with it - it looks pretty damn good? there's a beta tester down the thread saying 6 is as solid as a rock, it has avid scale trimming tools, FCPX bin scrubbing (with a viewer), genuine USP tasties like warp stabiliser (don't you just love that thing? for promos?)
I have been pretty consistently rooting for it, but I don't actually think this release requires rooting for. The toolset is ferocious, its 64 bit, cross platform, its opening into CL..
so say as an editor - he said grandly... your concerns would be asset acquisition, management and categorisation, timeline/modal trimming for story and output no?-
this thing dynamically trims as well as Avid, say the people who actually know what they are doing, I know I can operate in the timeline as I have in FCP, and instead of being in FCP, I'm in a kissing cousin of AE and PS?
But, the thing I find genuinely interesting about all this, is that adobe look to have analysed and fully replicated Avid's renowned dynamic trim workflow, in a heavily compressed competition driven timeframe.
And this after ten years of Apple completely failing to do anything like the same.
I never knew, until I saw the full Avid demos a few months ago, how obviously critical dynamic trimming could be, and.. it's interesting
to say the least
, that Apple never got it together in ten years, the current incarnation X with the precision trimmer has nothing like it, in fact worse, given the conflict between the skimmer and the timeline marker, the play forward, slap spacebar stop to mark doesn't work to my understanding?
bottom line: Adobe put an entire best in class editing trim architecture together quick smart for uncomplicated, competitive reasons.
If I'm going to be a prisoner with a dilemma as Hurd has put it - as an editor, I would far, far sooner be a prisoner of Adobe than Apple.
http://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos
http://www.ogallchoir.net
promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
One year later...
by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:47:07 am
Re: One year later...
by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:14:50 am
Re: One year later...
by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:20:04 am
Re: One year later...
by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:57:18 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 1:50:26 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:32 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:13:30 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:39:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:43:08 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:17:05 pm
Re: One year later...
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:30:59 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:58:28 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:31:58 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:00:49 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:57:15 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:36:37 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:30 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:24:44 pm
Re: One year later...
by Greg Andonian on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:45:54 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:00:55 am
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:10:06 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:14:05 am
Re: One year later...
by Mitch Ives on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:09:58 pm
Re: One year later...
by Paul Nordin on Apr 21, 2012 at 10:30:40 pm
Re: One year later...
by Mitch Ives on Apr 22, 2012 at 5:42:19 am
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:23:21 pm
Re: One year later...
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:29:14 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:40:49 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:07:00 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:51:23 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:37:17 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:37:07 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:41:22 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:23:17 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:15:11 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:25:41 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:31:23 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Chris Harlan on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:08:41 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:06:35 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:04:43 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:33:29 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:49:25 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:09:25 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:30:08 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:58 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:20:28 pm
Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:53:03 am
Re: One year later...
by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:01:44 pm
Re: One year later...
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:49 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:05:32 pm
Re: One year later...
by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:23:38 pm
Re: One year later...
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:27:35 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:40:23 pm
Re: One year later...
by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:48:18 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:28:54 pm
Re: One year later...
by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:26:21 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:56:57 pm
Re: One year later...
by Lemur Hayop on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:43:07 am
Re: One year later...
by Shane Ross on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:28 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:44:13 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:47:26 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:47:23 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:50:33 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:18:30 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:11:19 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:34:38 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:07:45 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:15:48 am
Re: One year later...
by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:04:26 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:25:54 pm
Re: One year later...
by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:55:27 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:03:38 pm
Re: One year later...
by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:47:26 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:30:14 am
Re: One year later...
by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:39:27 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:50:04 am
Re: One year later...
by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:29:09 pm
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:38:00 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:47:45 am
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:12:40 am
Re: One year later...
by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:05:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Shane Ross on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:57:16 pm
Re: One year later...
by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:05:36 pm
Re: One year later...
by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:45:05 pm
Re: One year later...
by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:06:07 pm
Re: One year later...
by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:59:31 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:16:54 pm
Re: One year later...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:09:02 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:17:38 pm
Re: One year later...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:11:07 am
Re: One year later...
by tony west on Apr 20, 2012 at 12:58:44 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:22:17 pm
Re: One year later...
by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:08:28 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:49:41 pm
Re: One year later...
by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:06:52 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:56:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:12:05 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:46:19 am
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:44:02 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:52:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:12:03 pm
Re: One year later...
by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:00 pm
Re: One year later...
by John Christie on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:28:14 pm
Re: One year later...
by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:56:47 pm
Re: One year later...
by David Lawrence on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:19:27 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:42 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:54:05 am
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:42:29 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:48:55 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:54:31 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:55:45 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:35 pm
Re: One year later...
by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:07:27 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:16:47 pm
Re: One year later...
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:26:15 pm
Re: One year later...
by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 9:36:18 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
FEATURES
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]