Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US :: FAQ
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:HomeFCP ForumFCP XFCPX TechniquesFCP TutorialsFC ServerBasics ForumPodcastFAQ

Re: Apple are hilarious

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Share on Facebook
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Chris KennyRe: Apple are hilarious
by on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:06:55 pm

[Walter Soyka] "They kind of are off in their own bizarre world. No one else has a parent/child timeline model, and that's the critical factor here in interchange."

The parent/child timeline is just a richer way of arranging stacked clips in time. It's entirely possible to throw away the original richness (the clip relationships) and reduce the timeline to clips stacked on tracks. It isn't really all that uncommon for content creation apps to have a rich internal data representation to aid in their operation, that is simplified or entirely discarded when moving data out of the app in an industry-standard interchange format. I don't see a problem with this. After all, what's the alternative? Apps never supporting anything that can't be encoded in a pre-existing industry standard format? That would slow apps to the level of progress seen from, say, web browsers (especially in the days before WHATWG), where lots of vendors spend years arguing over things as part of a standards process before new features can be made available to users.

[Walter Soyka] "In order to work with FCPX, other apps must develop specific FCPX support."

Or the ecosystem surrounding FCP X needs to provide a general solution for getting an EDL out of FCP X (for the probably 5% of FCP users who have ever needed this) -- which seems to be happening. I don't really see a problem with Apple leaving certain features as third-party 'market opportunities'. Particularly if doing so encourages progress, and I rather suspect Apple has left EDL out of FCP X to date at least in part because they want to pressure other developers to support richer interchange formats.

It's not that different from leaving ADB and serial ports off of the first iMac, thus creating pressure on peripheral vendors to switch to USB -- and that was a case where Apple didn't have a 'clean slate' and their actions were rather disruptive, but it worked. Apple's OS 9 to OS X transition was also significantly more disruptive than, say, Microsoft's transition of the consumer market to NT-based Windows. Apple has always been willing to subject its users to more disruptive transitions in order to push the market to move a little faster.

--
Digital Workflow/Colorist, Nice Dissolve.

You should follow me on Twitter here. Or read our blog.


Posts IndexRead Thread
Reply   Like  
Share on Facebook


Current Message Thread:




LOGIN TO REPLY



FORUMSTUTORIALSFEATURESVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2014 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]