Creative COW

SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US

APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:

FCPX Techniques

Re: One year later...

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Andrew Kimery

Re: One year later...
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:43:08 pm

My experience has been closer to Chris Harlan's than Chris Kenny's.

Whenever I run into someone (either online or in the real world) that is optimistic or interested w/FCP X I'm initially taken back because it happens so infrequently. Maybe it's because lots of the work that I do isn't, or doesn't appear to be, conducive to FCPX's workflow so maybe it's just that I don't swim in the circles that even see FCPX as a possibility. I don't know really.

W/o knowing more details about the SCRI numbers it's hard to know what they really mean. How many people are using FCPX day in and day out and how many played w/it for a few hours and haven't touched it sense? I mean, last year Adobe claimed some huge number of PPro installs (more than FCP classic) but how many of those are people actually using PPro vs PPro just came along for the ride in the CS purchase?

A few years ago a SCRI study showed FCP w/like 52% of the NLE market and Avid w/22% while an ACE survey from the same period showed like 80% of ACE members used Avid and 20% used FCP. W/o having more granular data (data that reflects your market, interests, workflows, and needs) the numbers aren't very useful in creating an accurate picture of what's going w/in all the niches that make up post production.

-Andrew

2.9 GHz 8-core (4,1), FCP 7.0.3, 10.6.6
Blackmagic Multibridge Eclipse (7.9.5)

Like

Current Message Thread:

One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:47:07 am
- Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:14:50 am
- Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:20:04 am
  - Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:57:18 am
  - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 1:50:26 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:32 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:13:30 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:39:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:43:08 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:17:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:30:59 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:58:28 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:31:58 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:00:49 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:57:15 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:36:37 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:30 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:24:44 pm
        Re: One year later... by Greg Andonian on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:45:54 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:00:55 am
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:10:06 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:14:05 am
        Re: One year later... by Mitch Ives on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:09:58 pm
        Re: One year later... by Paul Nordin on Apr 21, 2012 at 10:30:40 pm
        Re: One year later... by Mitch Ives on Apr 22, 2012 at 5:42:19 am
    - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:23:21 pm
        Re: One year later... by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:29:14 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:40:49 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:07:00 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:51:23 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:37:17 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:37:07 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:41:22 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:23:17 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:15:11 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:25:41 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:31:23 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Chris Harlan on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:08:41 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:06:35 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:04:43 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:33:29 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:49:25 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:09:25 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:30:08 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:58 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:20:28 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:53:03 am
        Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:01:44 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:49 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:05:32 pm
        Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:23:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:27:35 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:40:23 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:48:18 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:28:54 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:26:21 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:56:57 pm
- Re: One year later... by Lemur Hayop on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:43:07 am
  - Re: One year later... by Shane Ross on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:28 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:44:13 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:47:26 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:47:23 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:50:33 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:18:30 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:11:19 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:34:38 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:07:45 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:15:48 am
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:04:26 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:25:54 pm
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:55:27 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:03:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:47:26 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:30:14 am
        Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:39:27 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:50:04 am
        Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:29:09 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:38:00 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:47:45 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:12:40 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:05:55 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Shane Ross on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:57:16 pm
        Re: One year later... by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:05:36 pm
        Re: One year later... by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:45:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:06:07 pm
        Re: One year later... by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:59:31 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:16:54 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:09:02 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:17:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:11:07 am
- Re: One year later... by tony west on Apr 20, 2012 at 12:58:44 pm
  - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:22:17 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:08:28 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:49:41 pm
        Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:06:52 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:56:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:12:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:46:19 am
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:44:02 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:52:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:12:03 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:00 pm
- Re: One year later... by John Christie on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:28:14 pm
  - Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:56:47 pm
    - Re: One year later... by David Lawrence on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:19:27 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:42 pm
- Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:54:05 am
  - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:42:29 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:48:55 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:54:31 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:55:45 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:35 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:07:27 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:16:47 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:26:15 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 9:36:18 pm


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS

© 2013 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]