Re: One year later...

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: One year later...
by Shane Ross on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:28 pm

[Lemur Hayop] "Newbies who don't know/care about NAB or what prose use."

Unless they want to get into the business...move to Hollywood or NY or other major market and find work. Then they want to know what the pros use. But if they are doing their own thing...FCX is fine.

I too think it has come a long way, and if Apple released FCX 10.0.3...the features that it has in 10.0.3, the reaction would have been a lot different. I wouldn't have thought they didn't care about the pro market. But now it is too late, I'm back to Avid for most of my broadcast work for more than one reason (still using tape being a big factor), and FCP 7 and Adobe CS6 for the rest.

I think that FCX 10.0.4 is great software, and that many will get great use from it. I, like Mark (because we do pretty much the same sort of TV...but I to TV docs) find that Avid MC6/Symphony 6 better suit our needs.

Shane
Little Frog Post
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:47:07 am
- Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:14:50 am
- Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:20:04 am
  - Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:57:18 am
  - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 1:50:26 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:32 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:13:30 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:39:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:43:08 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:17:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:30:59 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:58:28 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:31:58 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:00:49 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:57:15 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:36:37 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:30 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:24:44 pm
        Re: One year later... by Greg Andonian on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:45:54 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:00:55 am
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:10:06 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:14:05 am
        Re: One year later... by Mitch Ives on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:09:58 pm
        Re: One year later... by Paul Nordin on Apr 21, 2012 at 10:30:40 pm
        Re: One year later... by Mitch Ives on Apr 22, 2012 at 5:42:19 am
    - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:23:21 pm
        Re: One year later... by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:29:14 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:40:49 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:07:00 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:51:23 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:37:17 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:37:07 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:41:22 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:23:17 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:15:11 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:25:41 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:31:23 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Chris Harlan on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:08:41 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:06:35 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:04:43 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:33:29 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:49:25 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:09:25 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:30:08 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:58 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:20:28 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:53:03 am
        Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:01:44 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:49 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:05:32 pm
        Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:23:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:27:35 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:40:23 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:48:18 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:28:54 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:26:21 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:56:57 pm
- Re: One year later... by Lemur Hayop on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:43:07 am
  - Re: One year later... by Shane Ross on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:28 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:44:13 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:47:26 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:47:23 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:50:33 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:18:30 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:11:19 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:34:38 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:07:45 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:15:48 am
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:04:26 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:25:54 pm
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:55:27 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:03:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:47:26 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:30:14 am
        Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:39:27 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:50:04 am
        Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:29:09 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:38:00 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:47:45 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:12:40 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:05:55 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Shane Ross on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:57:16 pm
        Re: One year later... by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:05:36 pm
        Re: One year later... by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:45:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:06:07 pm
        Re: One year later... by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:59:31 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:16:54 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:09:02 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:17:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:11:07 am
- Re: One year later... by tony west on Apr 20, 2012 at 12:58:44 pm
  - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:22:17 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:08:28 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:49:41 pm
        Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:06:52 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:56:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:12:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:46:19 am
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:44:02 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:52:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:12:03 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:00 pm
- Re: One year later... by John Christie on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:28:14 pm
  - Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:56:47 pm
    - Re: One year later... by David Lawrence on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:19:27 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:42 pm
- Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:54:05 am
  - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:42:29 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:48:55 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:54:31 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:55:45 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:35 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:07:27 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:16:47 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:26:15 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 9:36:18 pm


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS