Re: One year later...

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: One year later...
by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:20:04 am

Hey Mark - great to meet you at the AJA booth. There was a lot of NLE buzz at NAB for sure - Smoke seemed to completely steal Avid's Symphony thunder and Premiere was everywhere.Thinking back to last year and the FCPX Supermeet takeover and June release fiasco - I wonder how many facilities that were FCP7 would have just waited it out if Apple had kept X under wraps until this year and shown 10.04 as the new FCP? Would all of the them still have switched or would more be making the transition to X? Not in your facilities case but in general?

Lance Bachelder
Writer, Editor, Director
Irvine, California

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:47:07 am
- Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:14:50 am
- Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:20:04 am
  - Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:57:18 am
  - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 1:50:26 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:32 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:13:30 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:39:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:43:08 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:17:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:30:59 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:58:28 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:31:58 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:00:49 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:57:15 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:36:37 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:30 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:24:44 pm
        Re: One year later... by Greg Andonian on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:45:54 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:00:55 am
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:10:06 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:14:05 am
        Re: One year later... by Mitch Ives on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:09:58 pm
        Re: One year later... by Paul Nordin on Apr 21, 2012 at 10:30:40 pm
        Re: One year later... by Mitch Ives on Apr 22, 2012 at 5:42:19 am
    - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:23:21 pm
        Re: One year later... by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:29:14 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:40:49 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:07:00 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:51:23 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:37:17 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:37:07 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:41:22 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:23:17 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:15:11 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:25:41 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:31:23 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Chris Harlan on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:08:41 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:06:35 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:04:43 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:33:29 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:49:25 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:09:25 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:30:08 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:58 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:20:28 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:53:03 am
        Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:01:44 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:49 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:05:32 pm
        Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:23:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:27:35 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:40:23 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:48:18 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:28:54 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:26:21 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:56:57 pm
- Re: One year later... by Lemur Hayop on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:43:07 am
  - Re: One year later... by Shane Ross on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:28 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:44:13 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:47:26 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:47:23 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:50:33 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:18:30 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:11:19 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:34:38 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:07:45 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:15:48 am
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:04:26 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:25:54 pm
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:55:27 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:03:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:47:26 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:30:14 am
        Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:39:27 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:50:04 am
        Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:29:09 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:38:00 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:47:45 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:12:40 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:05:55 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Shane Ross on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:57:16 pm
        Re: One year later... by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:05:36 pm
        Re: One year later... by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:45:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:06:07 pm
        Re: One year later... by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:59:31 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:16:54 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:09:02 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:17:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:11:07 am
- Re: One year later... by tony west on Apr 20, 2012 at 12:58:44 pm
  - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:22:17 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:08:28 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:49:41 pm
        Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:06:52 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:56:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:12:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:46:19 am
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:44:02 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:52:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:12:03 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:00 pm
- Re: One year later... by John Christie on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:28:14 pm
  - Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:56:47 pm
    - Re: One year later... by David Lawrence on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:19:27 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:42 pm
- Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:54:05 am
  - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:42:29 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:48:55 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:54:31 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:55:45 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:35 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:07:27 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:16:47 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:26:15 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 9:36:18 pm


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • FEATURES • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS