SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
FEATURES
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Podcast
FAQ
Re: FCPX or Not...
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: FCPX or Not...
by
Simon Ubsdell
on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:37:47 pm
[David Lawrence]
"LOL, well what's crazy is 8 months and two updates out they still haven't managed to provide basics like audio sync markers. What's up with that? The fact that something this elementary is missing to begin with says a lot about their audio design assumptions and priorities. They have a lot of work to do."
Yup. I'm afraid Schadenfreude is not an attractive behaviour pattern but I can't help being amused at seeing the peerless Apple showing itself to be completely imbecilic over this whole product.
They've swum way out of their depth and they don't really have a clue how to get back to shore. It shouldn't be funny - but it is.
They obviously massively miscalculated how long it would take to get it into any decent kind of shape, then they panicked and just threw it out there anyway. And funniest of all is that they're just carrying right on throwing out stuff that is way from ready, from multicam to broadcast monitoring to PSD support, to 10.0.3 itself which is clearly more dysnfunctional than anything we've seen so far.
I'm sorry but to me they just look sillier and sillier as time goes by - and I'm loving it.
And I think it is a hugely valuable lesson to us all. No business, however mighty, is infallible. Empires rise. They also fall.
If I have a reason for sticking around and watching, it's because there's nothing quite as satisfying as a good come-uppance.
Simon Ubsdell
http://www.tokyo-uk.com
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 19, 2012 at 2:43:33 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Daniel Frome on Mar 19, 2012 at 11:58:18 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 19, 2012 at 12:08:10 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Shane Ross on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:11:32 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Mitch Ives on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:34:08 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:10:14 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:05:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:09:22 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:58:33 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:08:17 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:38:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:44:35 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:47:24 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:52:06 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:57:20 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:03:29 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:08:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:53:35 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:05:36 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:04:56 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:24:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:04 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:10:29 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:37:41 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:26:42 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Daniel Frome on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:22:44 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:25:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:48:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:08:51 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:54 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:16:18 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:36:10 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Rick Fromet on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:35:18 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by tony west on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:37:06 pm
Re: (OT) FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 8:57:53 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:47:43 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 8:47:43 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:50:34 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:15:44 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:49:12 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Walter Soyka on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:55:09 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:52:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:10:31 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:52:08 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:48 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:44:37 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 3:22:05 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:16:24 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:36:49 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:28:05 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:35:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 9:27:22 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:37:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:34:18 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:38:29 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:41:28 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:51:57 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 1:14:07 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26:16 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:40:12 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:03:37 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:25:06 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:12:31 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:09:52 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:32:19 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:06:40 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:01:27 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:19:56 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:20 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 3:52:26 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:33:41 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Bill Davis on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:15:53 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:02:39 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:36:04 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:38:28 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 2:43:05 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:21 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:09:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:57:57 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 5:14:07 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:53:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 21, 2012 at 9:34:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:03:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gothmann on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:28:18 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:15:11 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:33:52 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Christian Schumacher on Mar 23, 2012 at 3:08:40 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:43:34 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56:54 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:58:14 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:57:42 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 5:57:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:05:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:22:03 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:30:36 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:40:19 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:08:28 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:22:52 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:30 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:37:53 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:08 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:53:44 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Thomas Frank on Mar 24, 2012 at 4:29:32 am
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
FEATURES
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]