SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: FCPX or Not...
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: FCPX or Not...
by
Jim Giberti
on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:02:39 am
[Bill Davis]
"Search is what makes the modern internet actually functional on a day to day basis. Not for "computer professionals" who could always manipulate the bits they needed, but for every day people.
I completely understand why all the professional editors here are so inflexibly stuck in obsessing on the fact that it doesn't "edit" the way other software does.
"
Which is why they've got half of a professional program Bill.
I'm not inflexibly stuck.
I'm very flexible, which is why I dove into FCPX and why, after doing a lot of work in it for half a year, I like half of FCPX.
The half they left out is the ability for professionals to use the proven, world class, talents and techniques that they've honed for decades, within their new X paradigm.
If Apple doesn't respect those invaluable skills learned over, probably, millions of hours of their users professional careers, then they're just arrogant wonks.
And if they are arrogant enough to think that our professional skills aren't worth supporting, then we should support Adobe so that we have a strong, software-only company that's builds programs based on their users needs.
It's called a professional relationship and Apple seems to think that that's a top down arrangement.
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
+2
Current Message Thread:
FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 19, 2012 at 2:43:33 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Daniel Frome on Mar 19, 2012 at 11:58:18 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 19, 2012 at 12:08:10 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Shane Ross on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:11:32 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Mitch Ives on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:34:08 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:10:14 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:05:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:09:22 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:58:33 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:08:17 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:38:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:44:35 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:47:24 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:52:06 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:57:20 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:03:29 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:08:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:53:35 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:05:36 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:04:56 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:24:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:04 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:10:29 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:37:41 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:26:42 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Daniel Frome on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:22:44 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:25:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:48:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:08:51 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:54 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:16:18 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:36:10 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Rick Fromet on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:35:18 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by tony west on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:37:06 pm
Re: (OT) FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 8:57:53 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:47:43 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 8:47:43 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:50:34 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:15:44 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:49:12 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Walter Soyka on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:55:09 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:52:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:10:31 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:52:08 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:48 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:44:37 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 3:22:05 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:16:24 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:36:49 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:28:05 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:35:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 9:27:22 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:37:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:34:18 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:38:29 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:41:28 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:51:57 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 1:14:07 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26:16 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:40:12 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:03:37 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:25:06 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:12:31 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:09:52 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:32:19 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:06:40 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:01:27 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:19:56 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:20 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 3:52:26 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:33:41 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Bill Davis on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:15:53 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:02:39 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:36:04 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:38:28 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 2:43:05 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:21 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:09:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:57:57 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 5:14:07 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:53:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 21, 2012 at 9:34:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:03:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gothmann on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:28:18 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:15:11 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:33:52 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Christian Schumacher on Mar 23, 2012 at 3:08:40 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:43:34 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56:54 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:58:14 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:57:42 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 5:57:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:05:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:22:03 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:30:36 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:40:19 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:08:28 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:22:52 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:30 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:37:53 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:08 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:53:44 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Thomas Frank on Mar 24, 2012 at 4:29:32 am
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]