Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't.

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't.
by Walter Soyka on Mar 21, 2012 at 3:04:37 am

[tony west] "They wanted to sync all the clips not just the first ones."

That's ok. PluralEyes can deal with multiple clips.

The latest version even works with FCPX's multicam.

[tony west] "If I have X why do I need PluraEyes. I thought X just copied what PluralEyes does."

PluralEyes is both faster and more reliable [link].

Next time you have a suitable project, try the demo. I'd be curious to hear your opinion.

Walter Soyka
Principal & Designer at Keen Live
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
RenderBreak Blog - What I'm thinking when my workstation's thinking
Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Robert Bracken on Mar 19, 2012 at 1:54:41 pm
- Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Steve Connor on Mar 19, 2012 at 1:58:37 pm
- Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Daniel Frome on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:07:16 pm
- Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Franz Bieberkopf on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:24:46 pm
- Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Richard Herd on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:29:58 pm
- Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:14:01 pm
  - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Robert Bracken on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:20:13 pm
    - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:48:28 pm
    - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Jim Giberti on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:22:02 pm
      - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Richard Herd on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:48:51 pm
- Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Paul Jay on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:41:25 pm
  - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:49:07 pm
  - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Jim Giberti on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:50:55 pm
  - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Chris Harlan on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:13:48 pm
    - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Jim Giberti on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:56:36 pm
      - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by TImothy Auld on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:06:07 pm
      - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:29:50 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Jim Giberti on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:12:05 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Michael Gissing on Mar 20, 2012 at 8:24:20 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Steve Connor on Mar 20, 2012 at 9:01:47 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by tony west on Mar 20, 2012 at 11:44:57 pm
  - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Walter Soyka on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:53:23 pm
    - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:58:18 pm
      - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Walter Soyka on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:54:17 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:45:45 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:04:22 pm
    - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:11:17 pm
      - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Walter Soyka on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:03:39 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:14:27 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Walter Soyka on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:06:17 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 8:35:16 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by TImothy Auld on Mar 20, 2012 at 8:49:30 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Steve Connor on Mar 20, 2012 at 9:25:57 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 9:29:10 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 9:43:17 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 9:45:38 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by TImothy Auld on Mar 20, 2012 at 9:55:07 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Frank Gothmann on Mar 20, 2012 at 10:19:53 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by TImothy Auld on Mar 20, 2012 at 10:33:18 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Steve Connor on Mar 20, 2012 at 11:07:53 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by TImothy Auld on Mar 20, 2012 at 11:24:54 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Frank Gothmann on Mar 21, 2012 at 12:09:19 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:48:39 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Frank Gothmann on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:19:45 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:32:43 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Frank Gothmann on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:10:55 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Jim Giberti on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:00:50 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by TImothy Auld on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:09:48 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Jim Giberti on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:26:18 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by TImothy Auld on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:29:50 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Jim Giberti on Mar 21, 2012 at 12:13:43 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Walter Soyka on Mar 20, 2012 at 9:05:42 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 9:18:20 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Walter Soyka on Mar 20, 2012 at 9:34:14 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 3:23:09 pm
    - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by tony west on Mar 21, 2012 at 12:23:34 am
      - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Walter Soyka on Mar 21, 2012 at 12:53:30 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by tony west on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:47:21 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Walter Soyka on Mar 21, 2012 at 3:04:37 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by tony west on Mar 21, 2012 at 3:42:30 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Walter Soyka on Mar 21, 2012 at 2:18:20 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by tony west on Mar 21, 2012 at 8:41:11 pm
      - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by TImothy Auld on Mar 21, 2012 at 12:55:41 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by tony west on Mar 21, 2012 at 2:04:12 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by TImothy Auld on Mar 21, 2012 at 12:47:50 pm
      - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Glenn Grant on Mar 23, 2012 at 6:13:49 pm
  - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by David Roth Weiss on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:29:11 pm
    - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:24:13 pm
      - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Jim Giberti on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:31:01 am
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by David Roth Weiss on Mar 21, 2012 at 2:13:14 pm
      - Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Paul Jay on Mar 21, 2012 at 5:28:43 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Walter Soyka on Mar 21, 2012 at 5:43:38 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Chris Harlan on Mar 21, 2012 at 6:22:57 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Craig Seeman on Mar 21, 2012 at 6:28:33 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Chris Harlan on Mar 21, 2012 at 6:59:09 pm
        Re: Thoughts on why FCP X is here to stay and the Mac Pro isn't. by Steve Connor on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:08:42 pm


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS