SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: FCPX or Not...
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: FCPX or Not...
by
Richard Herd
on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:03:37 pm
Did you play with it, or did you really cut and deliver something?
I'm almost done with a project (did not DL 10.0.3 thankfully); it's a non-deadline project by the way. The actual cutting of a story is superior. I've also simultaneously been using Legacy and PP for other stuff, both of which "feel" like steps backward in terms of actually cutting a story, and we all know we do a lot more than just cut. I downloaded Media Composer trial, but sheesh I still dislike it, haven't used it since 2003.
By "preview monitor," do you mean a color grade monitor thing? Or do you mean the skimmer tool? The color correction window is pretty decent--better than PP, IMO-- but I miss my curves from Color. As far as color grading goes I hear, but haven't used, the XML to da vinci work very well.
[Andy Field]
"Folks who must deliver deadline broadcast and film aren't sitting around playing with something only to make their work more difficult"
In fact they are just "playing" with X, because they are too busy hopefully to actually learn X. And make no mistake about it: there is a learning curve. I've said it before, I'll say it again. I had to read the manual so often to simply begin a project and wrap my imagination around the nomenclature that this first project has taken easily three times longer than it should have. Knowing this, I offered a discount to the producer. But now that I know the stuff I know the actual cutting is much quicker, more accurate, more flexible.
But I know there's no way to learn something without doing it. In any case, one must blow away the notion that one can sit down in any app and then know it after playing with it once or twice. Why do that if you have a customer sitting next to you? Could you imagine: "Sorry I need to close the app and restart it." And "sorry I need to duplicate the project every now and again and store it on a hidden .dmg in case the project gets corrupt."
I can't imagine anyone is still reading, but if so: I do 99% of my title in AE, anyway, but I find myself using the titler in X -- better than legacy. My next real learning is audio. Whew. Wish me luck. The best part is the FX are all from Logic and they really work awesome-ly.
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 19, 2012 at 2:43:33 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Daniel Frome on Mar 19, 2012 at 11:58:18 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 19, 2012 at 12:08:10 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Shane Ross on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:11:32 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Mitch Ives on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:34:08 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:10:14 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:05:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:09:22 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:58:33 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:08:17 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:38:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:44:35 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:47:24 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:52:06 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:57:20 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:03:29 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:08:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:53:35 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:05:36 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:04:56 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:24:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:04 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:10:29 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:37:41 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:26:42 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Daniel Frome on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:22:44 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:25:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:48:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:08:51 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:54 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:16:18 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:36:10 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Rick Fromet on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:35:18 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by tony west on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:37:06 pm
Re: (OT) FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 8:57:53 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:47:43 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 8:47:43 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:50:34 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:15:44 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:49:12 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Walter Soyka on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:55:09 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:52:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:10:31 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:52:08 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:48 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:44:37 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 3:22:05 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:16:24 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:36:49 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:28:05 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:35:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 9:27:22 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:37:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:34:18 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:38:29 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:41:28 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:51:57 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 1:14:07 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26:16 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:40:12 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:03:37 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:25:06 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:12:31 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:09:52 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:32:19 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:06:40 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:01:27 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:19:56 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:20 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 3:52:26 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:33:41 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Bill Davis on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:15:53 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:02:39 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:36:04 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:38:28 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 2:43:05 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:21 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:09:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:57:57 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 5:14:07 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:53:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 21, 2012 at 9:34:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:03:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gothmann on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:28:18 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:15:11 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:33:52 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Christian Schumacher on Mar 23, 2012 at 3:08:40 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:43:34 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56:54 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:58:14 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:57:42 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 5:57:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:05:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:22:03 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:30:36 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:40:19 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:08:28 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:22:52 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:30 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:37:53 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:08 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:53:44 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Thomas Frank on Mar 24, 2012 at 4:29:32 am
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]