Re: FCPX or Not...

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:36:10 am

[Chris Harlan] "So, when you say "broadcaster," you mean a few people delivering to broadcast, and not what the term traditionally means--NBC, CBS, ITV, PBS, etc.?"

I believe there is one broadcaster in the Netherlands that moved to FCPX (so he's told me). I'd love to see about interviewing them. As much as I like FCPX I still see some significant facility level issues so I'm curious about this is as well. You'd think Apple would be all over them for promotional purposes.

Posts Index

Read Thread

-1

Current Message Thread:

FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 19, 2012 at 2:43:33 am
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Daniel Frome on Mar 19, 2012 at 11:58:18 am
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Steve Connor on Mar 19, 2012 at 12:08:10 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not... by Shane Ross on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:11:32 pm
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Mitch Ives on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:34:08 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:10:14 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:05:15 pm
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:09:22 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:58:33 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:08:17 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:38:58 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:44:35 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:47:24 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:52:06 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:57:20 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:03:29 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:08:58 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:53:35 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:05:36 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39:15 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:04:56 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:24:15 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:04 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:10:29 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:37:41 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:26:42 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Daniel Frome on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:22:44 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:25:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:48:45 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:08:51 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:54 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:16:18 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:36:10 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Rick Fromet on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:35:18 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by tony west on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:37:06 pm
        Re: (OT) FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 8:57:53 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:47:43 am
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 8:47:43 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:50:34 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not... by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:15:44 pm
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:49:12 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Walter Soyka on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:55:09 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:52:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:10:31 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:52:08 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:48 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:44:37 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 3:22:05 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:16:24 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:36:49 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:28:05 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:35:45 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 9:27:22 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:37:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:34:18 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:38:29 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:41:28 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:51:57 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 1:14:07 am
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26:16 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:40:12 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:03:37 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:25:06 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:12:31 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Steve Connor on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:09:52 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:32:19 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:06:40 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:01:27 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:19:56 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:20 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 3:52:26 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:33:41 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Bill Davis on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:15:53 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:02:39 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:36:04 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:38:28 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 2:43:05 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:21 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:09:58 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:57:57 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 5:14:07 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:53:45 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 21, 2012 at 9:34:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:03:45 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gothmann on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:28:18 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:15:11 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Andy Field on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:33:52 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Christian Schumacher on Mar 23, 2012 at 3:08:40 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:43:34 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56:54 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:58:14 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:57:42 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 5:57:58 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:05:15 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:22:03 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:30:36 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:40:19 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:08:28 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:22:52 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:30 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:37:53 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:08 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:53:44 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Thomas Frank on Mar 24, 2012 at 4:29:32 am


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • FEATURES • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS