Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 11:47:04 pm

[T.a. Franks] "Remove the Layer tab and replace it with a Node tab! Unless they don't want get serious."

Unfortunately Motion was conceived as a motion graphics tool to be an editor-friendly companion to FCP. It was designed by the ex-Combustion designers with an eye towards improving on LiveType and not really becoming Shake or After Effects, for that matter.

- Oliver

Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 22, 2012 at 12:44:10 pm
- Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Tom Wolsky on Feb 22, 2012 at 1:40:07 pm
- Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Steve Connor on Feb 22, 2012 at 2:07:17 pm
- Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Rafael Amador on Feb 22, 2012 at 2:29:54 pm
  - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by T.a. Franks on Feb 24, 2012 at 11:39:17 pm
    - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 11:47:04 pm
- Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 22, 2012 at 2:31:52 pm
- Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Walter Soyka on Feb 22, 2012 at 3:10:01 pm
  - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 6:15:34 pm
    - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Walter Soyka on Feb 22, 2012 at 6:51:30 pm
      - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 7:40:22 pm
    - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 22, 2012 at 8:50:06 pm
      - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 9:19:15 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Walter Soyka on Feb 22, 2012 at 9:43:16 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Michael Gissing on Feb 22, 2012 at 10:44:33 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 11:12:59 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Michael Gissing on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:34:49 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Bill Davis on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:12:21 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Michael Gissing on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:13:45 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Michael Gissing on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:26:00 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Gary Cole on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:11:07 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Richard Herd on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:40:44 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 11:52:37 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:28:29 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 22, 2012 at 10:13:05 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 10:53:14 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:34:51 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:50:43 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:23:15 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:58:20 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:59:21 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:48:20 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:39:23 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:16:39 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:19:25 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:22:48 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:50:34 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:55:30 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:08:23 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:22:10 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:47:44 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:39:34 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:49:36 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:49:53 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:34:33 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Walter Soyka on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:31:16 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:50:14 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Walter Soyka on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:06:06 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:20:48 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Walter Soyka on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:52:36 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:00:27 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:04:37 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:30:55 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:43:23 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:46:43 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:52:00 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:59:12 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:09:51 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:23:56 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:04:56 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:13:22 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 7:11:29 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 12:45:34 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:06:45 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:12:45 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:50:00 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:48:04 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jim Giberti on Feb 24, 2012 at 12:07:38 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 24, 2012 at 12:37:54 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:03:45 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:10:41 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:48:18 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:55:00 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:00:44 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:07:55 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:10:59 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:18:36 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:34:34 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:18:05 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bill Davis on Feb 24, 2012 at 3:27:24 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:02:39 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Franz Bieberkopf on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:27:33 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 11:04:37 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Franz Bieberkopf on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:52:45 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 2:05:36 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bill Davis on Feb 24, 2012 at 3:45:20 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:48:21 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:45:09 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bret Williams on Feb 23, 2012 at 7:07:19 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:09:09 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:11:16 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:15:45 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bret Williams on Feb 23, 2012 at 10:25:50 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Christian Schumacher on Feb 24, 2012 at 5:37:18 pm
    - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Richard Herd on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:32:07 pm


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • FEATURES • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS