Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINESTOCKYARDVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:HomeFCP ForumFCP XFCPX TechniquesFCP TutorialsFC ServerBasics ForumTrainingPodcastFAQ

Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Share on Facebook
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Simon UbsdellRe: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:13:22 pm

[Chris Harlan] "I'm still using 4, but when I have time I might gravitate to 5 and use FCPX/Compressor as its i/o."

I'd highly recommend Compressor 4 (which you can use even without FCPX). Although it's still a 32 bit app, the 64 bit job controller means that my 8 cores now show up as 16 cores with a virtual cluster, which is a very pretty sight indeed. And I'm getting some very impressive encode times as a result.

Simon Ubsdell
Director/Editor/Writer
http://www.tokyo-uk.com


Posts IndexRead Thread
Reply   Like  
Share on Facebook


Current Message Thread:



LOGIN TO REPLY



FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2013 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]