Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:HomeFCP ForumFCP XFCPX TechniquesFCP TutorialsFC ServerBasics ForumTrainingPodcastFAQ

Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Share on Facebook
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Chris HarlanRe: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:04:56 pm

[Simon Ubsdell] "[Jeremy Garchow] "Again, I have no idea how valuable my point is or if I know what I am talking about, or am qualified for your level of expertise, but good riddance to STP. The interchange sucked between 7 and STP."

I really do beg to differ, sorry!
"


I too dig STP, and am sorry to see it go. I use/used it a lot, and that's with Logic, ProTools, and Digital Performer sitting right next to it. (I use them a lot, too, but just for different stuff.)


[Simon Ubsdell] "I can't see that anyone who recognizes the astonishing depth and complexity, not to mention the massive potential, in Motion, could possibly want to see it diluted by being bundled into FCPX to its certain major detriment,"


I agree, as well. I'm still using 4, but when I have time I might gravitate to 5 and use FCPX/Compressor as its i/o.


Posts IndexRead Thread
Reply   Like  
Share on Facebook


Current Message Thread:




LOGIN TO REPLY



FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINESTOCKYARDVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2013 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]