SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by
Steve Connor
on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:04:37 pm
[Simon Ubsdell]
"To my mind, it is the repeated and highly vocal demand over the years for an uber-app to replace Final Cut Studio that has been behind Apple's thinking with FCPX. Gone are STP and Color, and I don't think anybody who knows what they're talking about could say this is an improvement.
"
I've been working in Motion this week and I forgot what a powerful tool it was and how relatively easy it is to use, I hope they continue it's development.
Fortunately Resolve has filled the gap left by the EOL'ing of Color and I'm desperately hoping the next version of Logic will replace STP.
Steve Connor
"FCPX Agitator"
Adrenalin Television
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 22, 2012 at 12:44:10 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Tom Wolsky on Feb 22, 2012 at 1:40:07 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Steve Connor on Feb 22, 2012 at 2:07:17 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Rafael Amador on Feb 22, 2012 at 2:29:54 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by T.a. Franks on Feb 24, 2012 at 11:39:17 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 11:47:04 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 22, 2012 at 2:31:52 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Walter Soyka on Feb 22, 2012 at 3:10:01 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 6:15:34 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Walter Soyka on Feb 22, 2012 at 6:51:30 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 7:40:22 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 22, 2012 at 8:50:06 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 9:19:15 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Walter Soyka on Feb 22, 2012 at 9:43:16 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Michael Gissing on Feb 22, 2012 at 10:44:33 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 11:12:59 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Michael Gissing on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:34:49 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Bill Davis on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:12:21 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Michael Gissing on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:13:45 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Michael Gissing on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:26:00 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Gary Cole on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:11:07 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Richard Herd on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:40:44 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 11:52:37 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:28:29 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 22, 2012 at 10:13:05 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 10:53:14 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:34:51 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:50:43 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:23:15 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:58:20 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:59:21 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:48:20 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:39:23 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:16:39 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:19:25 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:22:48 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:50:34 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:55:30 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:08:23 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:22:10 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:47:44 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:39:34 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:49:36 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:49:53 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:34:33 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Walter Soyka on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:31:16 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:50:14 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Walter Soyka on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:06:06 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:20:48 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Walter Soyka on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:52:36 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:00:27 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:04:37 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:30:55 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:43:23 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:46:43 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:52:00 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:59:12 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:09:51 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:23:56 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:04:56 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:13:22 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 7:11:29 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 12:45:34 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:06:45 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:12:45 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:50:00 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:48:04 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jim Giberti on Feb 24, 2012 at 12:07:38 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 24, 2012 at 12:37:54 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:03:45 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:10:41 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:48:18 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:55:00 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:00:44 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:07:55 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:10:59 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:18:36 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:34:34 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:18:05 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bill Davis on Feb 24, 2012 at 3:27:24 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:02:39 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Franz Bieberkopf on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:27:33 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 11:04:37 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Franz Bieberkopf on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:52:45 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 2:05:36 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bill Davis on Feb 24, 2012 at 3:45:20 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:48:21 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:45:09 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bret Williams on Feb 23, 2012 at 7:07:19 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:09:09 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:11:16 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:15:45 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bret Williams on Feb 23, 2012 at 10:25:50 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Christian Schumacher on Feb 24, 2012 at 5:37:18 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Richard Herd on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:32:07 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]