SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by
Jeremy Garchow
on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:48:04 pm
[Oliver Peters]
"I answered that in another reply, but yes, I see the layers in Motion and in AE as tracks. "
Wow. I don't, especially in AE. I can't add another clip to a layer in AE without a nest. And AE's nests don't do a good job of showing you what's inside either. At least secondary stoyrkines do, and with Motion the groups scan be expanded to show what's inside as well.
[Oliver Peters]
"The reason is that you can adjust their position against time and you can also change in/out points and slip the media content of each clip."
And you can't do this in X? This is what makes a track a track?
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 22, 2012 at 12:44:10 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Tom Wolsky on Feb 22, 2012 at 1:40:07 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Steve Connor on Feb 22, 2012 at 2:07:17 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Rafael Amador on Feb 22, 2012 at 2:29:54 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by T.a. Franks on Feb 24, 2012 at 11:39:17 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 11:47:04 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 22, 2012 at 2:31:52 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Walter Soyka on Feb 22, 2012 at 3:10:01 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 6:15:34 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Walter Soyka on Feb 22, 2012 at 6:51:30 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 7:40:22 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 22, 2012 at 8:50:06 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 9:19:15 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Walter Soyka on Feb 22, 2012 at 9:43:16 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Michael Gissing on Feb 22, 2012 at 10:44:33 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 11:12:59 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Michael Gissing on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:34:49 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Bill Davis on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:12:21 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Michael Gissing on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:13:45 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Michael Gissing on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:26:00 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Gary Cole on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:11:07 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Richard Herd on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:40:44 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 11:52:37 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7)
by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:28:29 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 22, 2012 at 10:13:05 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 10:53:14 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:34:51 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:50:43 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:23:15 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:58:20 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:59:21 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:48:20 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:39:23 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:16:39 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:19:25 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:22:48 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:50:34 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:55:30 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:08:23 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:22:10 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:47:44 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:39:34 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:49:36 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:49:53 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:34:33 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Walter Soyka on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:31:16 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:50:14 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Walter Soyka on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:06:06 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:20:48 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Walter Soyka on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:52:36 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:00:27 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:04:37 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:30:55 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:43:23 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:46:43 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:52:00 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:59:12 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:09:51 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:23:56 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:04:56 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:13:22 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 7:11:29 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 12:45:34 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:06:45 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:12:45 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:50:00 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:48:04 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jim Giberti on Feb 24, 2012 at 12:07:38 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 24, 2012 at 12:37:54 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:03:45 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:10:41 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:48:18 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:55:00 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:00:44 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:07:55 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:10:59 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:18:36 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:34:34 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:18:05 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bill Davis on Feb 24, 2012 at 3:27:24 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:02:39 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Franz Bieberkopf on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:27:33 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 11:04:37 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Franz Bieberkopf on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:52:45 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 2:05:36 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bill Davis on Feb 24, 2012 at 3:45:20 am
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:48:21 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:45:09 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bret Williams on Feb 23, 2012 at 7:07:19 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:09:09 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:11:16 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:15:45 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Bret Williams on Feb 23, 2012 at 10:25:50 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Christian Schumacher on Feb 24, 2012 at 5:37:18 pm
Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless
by Richard Herd on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:32:07 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]