SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: Remaining enhancements
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Remaining enhancements
by
Jeremy Garchow
on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:33:42 am
[Oliver Peters]
"Hypothetically, if Boris came up with their own Xto7 or 7toX transfer tool, the resulting translations might look completely different from those of IA."
But isn't this true when going from any track <-> trackless (or layer) based system?
My fcp timelines look way different in AE. I know, completely different apps and uses, but same idea.
Fcpx's timeline is unique, so the resulting translations might be unique as long as the stacking/layer order is correct, to honor correct playback/composite/nest/whatever.
Again this type of thing doesn't bother me as I frequently use the duck to AE and the timelines are different, but my intent is still there in the two different environments (minus audio of course, so it's not a direct comparison).
In pro tools, audio engineers frequently rearrange what I've done in fcp, but they understand my intent.
I haven't tested everything, but my what I've sent 7toX so far, all of the intent is there, even if it looks different from my fcp7 timeline. As long as there are no glaring omissions (travel mattes/plug ins/things that simply don't translate like some audio weirdness due to X's weird audio handling), the timelines playback the same from both NLEs. And if they don't, there's a bit of clean up to do, but nothing horrendous when considering this was thought to be impossible on January 30.
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 8, 2012 at 3:27:36 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Kevin Patrick on Feb 8, 2012 at 3:35:07 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Mark Dobson on Feb 8, 2012 at 5:10:28 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Andy Neil on Feb 8, 2012 at 5:20:56 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Craig Seeman on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:09:12 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:20:29 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Craig Seeman on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:59:36 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:22:53 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Andy Neil on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:55:26 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Ben Scott on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:51:38 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:13:14 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:23:46 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by John Heagy on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:46:21 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Brad Davis on Feb 8, 2012 at 10:08:59 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 10:14:22 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Brad Davis on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:09:47 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:16:47 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Michael Gissing on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:24:29 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Michael Gissing on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:29:44 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:37:09 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:31:53 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Michael Gissing on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:41:38 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:52:43 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:56:56 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:57:44 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Michael Gissing on Feb 9, 2012 at 12:58:22 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:11:32 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:19:17 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Michael Gissing on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:26:05 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:57:14 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 12:37:40 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by John Heagy on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:26:41 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Michael Gissing on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:36:12 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Walter Soyka on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:00:55 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:15:12 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:33:42 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:28:29 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:38:31 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:52:41 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:05:53 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 10, 2012 at 2:57:58 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Paul Dickin on Feb 9, 2012 at 9:54:32 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Walter Soyka on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:05:51 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:30:23 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Craig Seeman on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:51:22 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:05:46 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Chris Harlan on Feb 9, 2012 at 6:22:24 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Walter Soyka on Feb 9, 2012 at 6:34:30 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 9, 2012 at 11:43:43 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 10, 2012 at 4:02:03 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Andreas Kiel on Feb 10, 2012 at 7:55:02 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 11, 2012 at 1:37:16 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Andreas Kiel on Feb 12, 2012 at 1:25:51 am
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]