Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:HomeFCP ForumFCP XFCPX TechniquesFCP TutorialsFC ServerBasics ForumTrainingPodcastFAQ

Re: Remaining enhancements

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Share on Facebook
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Oliver PetersRe: Remaining enhancements
by on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:52:43 pm

I'm not sure it's a given that OMF requires a licensing fee and if it does, whether that's a significant fee. Besides, Apple already provides OMF via Logic. Avid and Apple also have a current (new) relationship, because Avid licenses the ProRes codec from Apple. If Apple were to do anything, they should probably go with AAF since that's the current standard with ongoing development.

The downside of third parties is that Apple takes no ownership of the features. We've already seen how this has burn the AD ProExport plug-in and others. Third party developers are often quicker to respond to issues, but they also have a smaller development team and a smaller beta tester pool (although I don't think Apple does enough beta testing of these products compared to other manufacturers.)

- Oliver

Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com


Posts IndexRead Thread
Reply   Like  
+1
Share on Facebook


Current Message Thread:




LOGIN TO REPLY



FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINESTOCKYARDVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2013 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]