Re: Bunim/Murray chooses Avid

[Lance Bachelder] "Sound is half of everything I do and I need more than 16 tracks, which is really only 8 stereo paris as I cut.Funny because of this problem, I took a 3rd look at FCPX and actually started liking it since the 10.02 update..."

I'm not sure if you had investigated this enough on Avid. Let me clarify, Avid had always supported 24 tracks of audio, granted it only allows 16 to be monitored and to be used at the mixer, all due to hardware limitations. But, for that matter, FCPX doesn't even have a mixer for riding audio levels, and it also has other limitations (like you cannot expand the "timeline" in fullscreen) So, if it has a faster waveform build, allows more than 24 and has some nice features with effects, that doesn't mean it is better than Avid in this regard. It all depends on the workflow, as always. I strongly suspect that will change in the coming years, and we will be able to verify which solution is going to be more constrained. And I bet it will be FCPX.