Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:HomeFCP ForumFCP XFCPX TechniquesFCP TutorialsFC ServerBasics ForumTrainingPodcastFAQ

Re: Version 1.0 is the new 0.9 - CNet Article

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Share on Facebook
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Jeremy GarchowRe: Version 1.0 is the new 0.9 - CNet Article
by on Dec 14, 2011 at 4:54:18 pm

[Craig Seeman] "this is already moving faster than Motion."

And let's be honest. I don't think anyone bought FCS for Motion. Maybe a few, but the vast majority of purchases I would venture to say was not for Motion. And Motion is not and ever would be Shake. I think Shake and Motion users knew that, right off.

I think Motion should be a part of FCP especially since it is now becoming an "fx" builder of sorts for FCPX.

Hopefully, FCPXML or MS-DOS will be able to tie these two applications together more seamlessly.

Jeremy


Posts IndexRead Thread
Reply   Like  
Share on Facebook


Current Message Thread:




LOGIN TO REPLY



FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINESTOCKYARDVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2013 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]