SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by
Lance Moody
on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:03:28 pm
While I am certainly growing to love X, I have to say that the way metadata is handled is CAUSING what I consider to be the biggest problem with X.
By apparently writing the metadata to the actual file, X chokes if the file is changed in ANY way.
This causes a myriad of problems by making stuff become unlinked (and worse, unlinkable).
I am not interested in doing any motion graphics or compositing inside FCP since the tools are always lackluster. So when I take a rendered item from After Effects and need to revise it, it is absurd that I can't just render the changed file again without having the changed file become an unrecoverable orphan and having to painfully import the rerendered file and replace the clips throughout the timeline.
This all worked fine and magically in FCP7.
Lance
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:18:32 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:30:58 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:36:00 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:32:41 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:32:34 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:37:28 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:33:59 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:48:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:02:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:18:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:45:45 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:26:17 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:05:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:36:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:27:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Tom Wolsky on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:33:22 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:32:14 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:39:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:52:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:46:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:55:01 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:32:00 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:46:54 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:59:21 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:26:16 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:35:39 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:43:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:32:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:39:21 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:40:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Avid)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:11:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:42:46 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:41:20 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:55:28 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:26:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:15:36 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:25:22 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:27:13 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:03:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:43:30 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:53 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:07:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:32:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:29:00 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:18:08 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Shane Ross on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:21:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:39:55 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:37:59 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:41:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:08:15 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:27:57 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:35:50 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:44:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:02:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:33:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:52:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:01:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:20:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:42:50 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:29:46 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:05:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:58:39 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:32:32 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:20:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:06 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:51:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:24:01 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:01:03 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:53 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:34:52 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:53:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:22:54 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:06:20 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:43:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:23:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:04:26 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:14:12 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:45:57 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:52:59 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:10:52 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:50:27 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 11:12:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:36:17 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 17, 2011 at 2:24:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:00:23 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:55:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:05:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:29:02 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:22:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:49:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:07:08 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:51:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:32:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Herb Sevush on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:53:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:03:04 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:07:57 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:45:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:37:25 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:47:51 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:58:51 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:46:24 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:56:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:35:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:20:16 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:26:20 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:12:35 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:17:18 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:03:28 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:19:24 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:42:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:44:44 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]