SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by
Jeremy Garchow
on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:00:23 pm
[Christian Schumacher]
"I believe Jeremy's experience on searching in FCP legacy's "Browser" is limited to a fat project with a massive bunch of clips in it. And I don't think he is into long-form, as well. "
Big project, lots of media, and lots of metadata. I will have to show you what one clip looks like when I get back to the office tomorrow. Every column is full, and not just with one field, but multiple, as FCP7s columns are very limited.
I don't know what long form has to do with it except my sequences aren't as long. While the sequences aren't long, I make up for it in volume, I can assure you that. That sounds like some sort of euphemism.
[Christian Schumacher]
" It is prudent to wait until FCP X matures, until then use your helmets and take the heat."
Dude. FCPXs searching is far better, more useful, more dynamic (and easier) than FCP7.
Combine that with the information that follows the clips in the timeline in the Timeline Index is great.
Got your helmet on? :-D
Jeremy
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:18:32 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:30:58 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:36:00 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:32:41 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:32:34 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:37:28 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:33:59 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:48:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:02:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:18:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:45:45 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:26:17 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:05:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:36:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:27:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Tom Wolsky on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:33:22 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:32:14 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:39:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:52:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:46:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:55:01 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:32:00 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:46:54 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:59:21 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:26:16 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:35:39 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:43:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:32:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:39:21 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:40:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Avid)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:11:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:42:46 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:41:20 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:55:28 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:26:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:15:36 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:25:22 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:27:13 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:03:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:43:30 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:53 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:07:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:32:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:29:00 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:18:08 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Shane Ross on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:21:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:39:55 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:37:59 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:41:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:08:15 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:27:57 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:35:50 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:44:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:02:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:33:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:52:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:01:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:20:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:42:50 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:29:46 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:05:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:58:39 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:32:32 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:20:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:06 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:51:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:24:01 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:01:03 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:53 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:34:52 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:53:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:22:54 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:06:20 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:43:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:23:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:04:26 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:14:12 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:45:57 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:52:59 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:10:52 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:50:27 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 11:12:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:36:17 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 17, 2011 at 2:24:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:00:23 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:55:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:05:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:29:02 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:22:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:49:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:07:08 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:51:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:32:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Herb Sevush on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:53:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:03:04 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:07:57 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:45:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:37:25 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:47:51 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:58:51 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:46:24 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:56:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:35:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:20:16 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:26:20 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:12:35 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:17:18 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:03:28 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:19:24 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:42:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:44:44 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]