Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:56:40 pm

Particularly evil if you have a camera button battery go bad and find it's internal clock tagged a clip as having been created in 1969!

(I have a project with a clip exactly like that right now - and it's annoying as hell!)

This is clearly something that needs to be revisited.

"Before speaking out ask yourself whether your words are true, whether they are respectful and whether they are needed in our civil discussions."-Justice O'Connor

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:18:32 am
- Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:30:58 am
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:36:00 am
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:32:41 am
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:32:34 am
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:37:28 am
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:33:59 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:48:11 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:02:42 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:18:35 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:45:45 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:26:17 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:05:44 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:36:40 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:27:31 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Tom Wolsky on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:33:22 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:32:14 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:39:56 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:52:35 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:46:44 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:55:01 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:32:00 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:46:54 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:59:21 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:26:16 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:35:39 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:43:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:32:48 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:39:21 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:40:48 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:05 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Avid) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:11:37 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:42:46 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:41:20 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:35 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:55:28 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:48 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:26:56 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:44 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:10 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:15:36 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:25:22 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:27:13 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:37 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:03:34 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:43:30 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:53 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:07:05 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:32:37 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:29:00 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:18:08 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Shane Ross on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:21:07 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:39:55 pm
- Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:37:59 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:41:56 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:08:15 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:27:57 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:35:50 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:44:34 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:02:31 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:33:40 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:52:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:01:37 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:20:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:42:50 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:29:46 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:05:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:58:39 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:32:32 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:20:42 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:06 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:51:48 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:24:01 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:01:03 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:53 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:11 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:34:52 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:53:34 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:22:54 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:06:20 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:43:07 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:23:42 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:04:26 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:14:12 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:45:57 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:52:59 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:10:52 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:50:27 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 11:12:11 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:36:17 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 17, 2011 at 2:24:07 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:00:23 pm
- Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:55:31 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:05:11 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:29:02 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:22:35 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:31 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:49:07 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:07:08 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:51:10 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:32:56 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Herb Sevush on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:53:10 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:03:04 am
- Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:07:57 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:45:10 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:37:25 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:47:51 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:58:51 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:46:24 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:56:40 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:35:05 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:20:16 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:26:20 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:12:35 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:17:18 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:03:28 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:19:24 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:42:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:44:44 pm


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS