Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm

[Jeremy Garchow] "Those two clips which are identical may or may not have a relationship to the clip in the timeline. It depends on which one you used. I personally think FCPX is way more highly flexible in this regard. I don't have to keep track of two clips. "

I guess I just don't see the value of that. I can't think of a real world case where it would matter to me, or why it would shorten anything--certainly not in what I do, though I'm of course willing to entertain that there are more things in editorial than are dreamt of in my philosophy.

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:18:32 am
- Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:30:58 am
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:36:00 am
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:32:41 am
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:32:34 am
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:37:28 am
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:33:59 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:48:11 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:02:42 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:18:35 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:45:45 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:26:17 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:05:44 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:36:40 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:27:31 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Tom Wolsky on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:33:22 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:32:14 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:39:56 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:52:35 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:46:44 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:55:01 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:32:00 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:46:54 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:59:21 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:26:16 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:35:39 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:43:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:32:48 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:39:21 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:40:48 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:05 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Avid) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:11:37 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:42:46 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:41:20 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:35 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:55:28 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:48 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:26:56 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:44 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:10 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:15:36 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:25:22 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:27:13 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:37 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:03:34 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:43:30 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:53 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:07:05 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:32:37 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:29:00 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:18:08 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Shane Ross on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:21:07 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:39:55 pm
- Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:37:59 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:41:56 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:08:15 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:27:57 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:35:50 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:44:34 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:02:31 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:33:40 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:52:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:01:37 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:20:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:42:50 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:29:46 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:05:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:58:39 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:32:32 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:20:42 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:06 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:51:48 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:24:01 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:01:03 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:53 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:11 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:34:52 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:53:34 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:22:54 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:06:20 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:43:07 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:23:42 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:04:26 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:14:12 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:45:57 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:52:59 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:10:52 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:50:27 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 11:12:11 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:36:17 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 17, 2011 at 2:24:07 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:00:23 pm
- Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:55:31 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:05:11 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:29:02 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:22:35 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:31 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:49:07 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:07:08 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:51:10 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:32:56 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Herb Sevush on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:53:10 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:03:04 am
- Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:07:57 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:45:10 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:37:25 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:47:51 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:58:51 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:46:24 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:56:40 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:35:05 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:20:16 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:26:20 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:12:35 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:17:18 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:03:28 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:19:24 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:42:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:44:44 pm


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS