Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:10 pm

[Bill Davis] "I expect you will now cease doing so since you've clearly judged it to be a "poor value" compared to your other available choices."

Oh, I'll continue to explore it, as well. I certainly haven't counted Apple out by any means. Unfortunately at this point, when trying to actually use it on projects for real clients, it hasn't performed as well as FCP7 based on the one criteria that it should - better performance based on a 64-bit architecture. I find that disconcerting. Some of that appears to be because of the unfortunate reliance on Motion for its effects.

I just think price is completely irrelevant in any argument related to Apple software. Their prices are set by marketing - pure and simple. This software wouldn't be any different if they charged $3, $300, $3,000 or $30,000.

But we are straying off of the topic: metadata.

- Oliver

Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:18:32 am
- Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:30:58 am
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:36:00 am
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:32:41 am
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:32:34 am
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:37:28 am
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:33:59 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:48:11 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:02:42 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:18:35 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:45:45 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:26:17 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:05:44 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:36:40 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:27:31 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Tom Wolsky on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:33:22 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:32:14 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:39:56 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:52:35 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:46:44 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:55:01 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:32:00 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:46:54 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:59:21 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:26:16 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:35:39 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:43:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:32:48 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:39:21 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:40:48 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:05 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Avid) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:11:37 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:42:46 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:41:20 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:35 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:55:28 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:48 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve) by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:26:56 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:44 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:10 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:15:36 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:25:22 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:27:13 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:37 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:03:34 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:43:30 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:53 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:07:05 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:32:37 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:29:00 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:18:08 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Shane Ross on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:21:07 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:39:55 pm
- Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:37:59 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:41:56 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:08:15 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:27:57 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:35:50 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:44:34 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:02:31 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:33:40 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:52:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:01:37 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:20:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:42:50 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:29:46 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:05:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:58:39 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:32:32 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:20:42 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:06 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:51:48 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:24:01 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:01:03 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:53 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:11 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:34:52 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:53:34 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:22:54 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:06:20 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:43:07 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:23:42 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:04:26 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:14:12 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:45:57 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:52:59 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:10:52 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:50:27 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 11:12:11 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:36:17 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 17, 2011 at 2:24:07 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:00:23 pm
- Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:55:31 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:05:11 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:29:02 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:22:35 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:31 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:49:07 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:07:08 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:51:10 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:32:56 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Herb Sevush on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:53:10 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Chris Harlan on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:03:04 am
- Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:07:57 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:45:10 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:37:25 pm
  - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:47:51 pm
    - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:58:51 pm
      - Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:46:24 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:56:40 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:35:05 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:20:16 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:26:20 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:12:35 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:17:18 am
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:03:28 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:19:24 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:42:09 pm
        Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:44:44 pm


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS