SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by
Christian Schumacher
on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:24:01 pm
Tony,
You're entitled to find something cumbersome, specially if you didn't know it existed in the first place.
I guess this is why the debating forum is for, huh?
On the other hand, how is that custom window lay-out working for you in X? I find it extremely cumbersome to scroll down to negative space when having stacked clips to work with in a timeline that cannot be expanded.
But that must be only me, perhaps?
And Jeremy,
On systems I have been to, no beach-balling or crashing when searching at all. YMMV.
I can drag the resulting bin or some of the clips to a new timeline and have them all in there, nicely.
And they go to the sequence in the order that they are sifted in that resulting bin.
This is very, very helpful.
And all of this without breaking any project relationship. Expanding this search on that timeline, the Find command also selects all clips that I further search for, so I can then copy them or drag 'em to a higher position.
I'm taking your word when you said you didn't used it that much.
I like the former FCP for its flexibility, something the new generation of this software is going to miss.
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:18:32 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:30:58 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:36:00 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:32:41 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:32:34 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:37:28 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:33:59 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:48:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:02:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:18:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:45:45 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:26:17 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:05:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:36:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:27:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Tom Wolsky on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:33:22 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:32:14 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:39:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:52:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:46:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:55:01 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:32:00 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:46:54 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:59:21 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:26:16 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:35:39 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:43:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:32:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:39:21 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:40:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Avid)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:11:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:42:46 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:41:20 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:55:28 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:26:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:15:36 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:25:22 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:27:13 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:03:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:43:30 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:53 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:07:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:32:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:29:00 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:18:08 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Shane Ross on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:21:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:39:55 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:37:59 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:41:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:08:15 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:27:57 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:35:50 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:44:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:02:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:33:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:52:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:01:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:20:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:42:50 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:29:46 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:05:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:58:39 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:32:32 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:20:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:06 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:51:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:24:01 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:01:03 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:53 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:34:52 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:53:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:22:54 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:06:20 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:43:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:23:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:04:26 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:14:12 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:45:57 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:52:59 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:10:52 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:50:27 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 11:12:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:36:17 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 17, 2011 at 2:24:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:00:23 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:55:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:05:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:29:02 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:22:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:49:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:07:08 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:51:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:32:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Herb Sevush on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:53:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:03:04 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:07:57 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:45:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:37:25 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:47:51 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:58:51 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:46:24 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:56:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:35:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:20:16 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:26:20 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:12:35 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:17:18 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:03:28 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:19:24 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:42:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:44:44 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]