SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by
Bill Davis
on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:45:45 pm
[Oliver Peters]
"To my knowledge, it's not there. I don't believe any of the P2 data comes across. With Alexa this data is carried in an XML, not the QT. Since FCP X doesn't read old XMLs, you don't get this info. Presumably Apple is leaning on the implementation of camera manufacturer plug-ins based on their SDK. That doesn't help with the QT issue though. For example, I never use native H264 5D files and always convert first. When I do, I add TC and Reel IDs. Only the TC is recognized by FCP X.
Oliver
"
That it might not "automatically" look for "P2" data right now, but it DOES "look" for CF card data and SD card data, so it's clearly capable of "reading cards" with finesse.
So this is merely a development issue, not a capabilities one.
And the FIRST thing on the design teams list was clearly not "cater primarily to the guys with $60,000 cameras" (Are you shocked at that in a $299 downloadable program? I'm not.
I'm comfortable that if they continue to get the fundamentals of the development really right, I think it's going to grow into a tool that handles EVERYBODY's FILES - regardless of origin- including all the meta-data variants. (why build it as a "resolution agnostic" tool otherwise?) but it's not a Version 1 priority. Nor should it be in my estimation.
FWIW.
"Before speaking out ask yourself whether your words are true, whether they are respectful and whether they are needed in our civil discussions."-Justice O'Connor
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:18:32 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:30:58 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:36:00 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:32:41 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:32:34 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:37:28 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:33:59 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:48:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:02:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:18:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:45:45 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:26:17 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:05:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:36:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:27:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Tom Wolsky on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:33:22 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:32:14 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:39:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:52:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:46:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:55:01 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:32:00 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:46:54 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:59:21 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:26:16 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:35:39 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:43:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:32:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:39:21 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:40:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Avid)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:11:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:42:46 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:41:20 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:55:28 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:26:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:15:36 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:25:22 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:27:13 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:03:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:43:30 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:53 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:07:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:32:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:29:00 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:18:08 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Shane Ross on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:21:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:39:55 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:37:59 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:41:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:08:15 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:27:57 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:35:50 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:44:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:02:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:33:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:52:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:01:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:20:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:42:50 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:29:46 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:05:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:58:39 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:32:32 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:20:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:06 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:51:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:24:01 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:01:03 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:53 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:34:52 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:53:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:22:54 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:06:20 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:43:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:23:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:04:26 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:14:12 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:45:57 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:52:59 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:10:52 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:50:27 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 11:12:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:36:17 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 17, 2011 at 2:24:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:00:23 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:55:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:05:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:29:02 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:22:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:49:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:07:08 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:51:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:32:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Herb Sevush on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:53:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:03:04 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:07:57 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:45:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:37:25 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:47:51 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:58:51 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:46:24 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:56:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:35:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:20:16 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:26:20 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:12:35 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:17:18 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:03:28 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:19:24 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:42:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:44:44 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]