SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by
Oliver Peters
on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:39:56 pm
[Bill Davis]
"But isn't' the very concept of a "REEL ID" a contextual thing? I mean it's certainly important meta-data - to my knowledge there isn't actually a STANDARD for what a REEL is in the modern scheme of thing."
Sure. But right now, Apple doesn't recognize its own "standard", which is an embedded name/number/etc. in the "reel" column within QuickTime. Camera manufacturers, such as ARRI, are using that to identify the card. Other folks, like Avid make a distinction between a reel/tape (something captured from a VTR) versus a source (file-based). Import a QT with embedded reel ID and it shows up as a source ID inside Media Composer.
So while it's contextual, Apple has provided a mechanism to use this slot in QuickTime files for whatever you need it to be. Sure would have been nice if they'd remembered that in the design of FCP X.
And please don't bring up Apple and STANDARDS in the same sentence ;-) Apple has never expressed any interest in adhering to any actual sanctioned standards.
- Oliver
Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:18:32 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:30:58 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:36:00 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:32:41 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Lawrence on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:32:34 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:37:28 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:33:59 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:48:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:02:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:18:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:45:45 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:26:17 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:05:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:36:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:27:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Tom Wolsky on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:33:22 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:32:14 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:39:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:52:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:46:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:55:01 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:32:00 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:46:54 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:59:21 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:26:16 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:35:39 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:43:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:32:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:39:21 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:40:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:48:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Avid)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:11:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:42:46 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:41:20 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:55:28 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why? (NOW OT: Resolve)
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:26:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:44 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:51:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:15:36 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:25:22 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:27:13 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:03:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:43:30 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:08:53 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:07:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:32:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:29:00 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:18:08 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Shane Ross on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:21:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:39:55 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:37:59 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:41:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:08:15 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:27:57 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:35:50 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 4:44:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:02:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:33:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:52:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:01:37 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:20:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:42:50 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:29:46 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:05:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:19:29 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:58:39 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:32:32 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:20:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:43:06 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:51:48 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:24:01 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:01:03 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:39:53 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by tony west on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:06:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:34:52 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:53:34 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:22:54 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:06:20 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:43:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:23:42 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:04:26 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:14:12 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:45:57 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:52:59 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:10:52 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by David Roth Weiss on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:50:27 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 17, 2011 at 11:12:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:36:17 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 17, 2011 at 2:24:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:00:23 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:55:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:05:11 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:29:02 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 5:22:35 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 6:00:31 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:49:07 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:07:08 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:51:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:32:56 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Herb Sevush on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:53:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Chris Harlan on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:03:04 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:07:57 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:45:10 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Christian Schumacher on Nov 16, 2011 at 7:37:25 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2011 at 3:47:51 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 16, 2011 at 8:58:51 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:46:24 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Bill Davis on Nov 16, 2011 at 9:56:40 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 16, 2011 at 10:35:05 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:20:16 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:26:20 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:12:35 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:17:18 am
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:03:28 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:19:24 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Lance Moody on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:42:09 pm
Re: FCPX metadata--how significant is it? And why?
by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:44:44 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]