Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:HomeFCP ForumFCP XFCPX TechniquesFCP TutorialsFC ServerBasics ForumTrainingPodcastFAQ

Re: Might Be An Interesting Read

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Share on Facebook
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Craig SeemanRe: Might Be An Interesting Read
by on Nov 11, 2011 at 7:50:07 pm

[Franz Bieberkopf] "But I think you need to read your statements above and think about the business decisions that people have described here (actual decisions, mind you, not speculation) in light of certain "vulnerabilities" that Apple's recent moves have made apparent - vulnerabilities of long term support, vulnerabilities in terms of reliance on one vendor."

Yes Apple's strategies is based on people accepting a primary reliance on a single vendor . . . Apple. It's worked for them with iPhone, iPad, iPod and the tie to iTunes.

You may not want to rely on one vendor but that's Apple's business model it is very successful.

In every case their "one vendor" model also involved third parties. ITunes and the App Store are vehicles for third parties to sell through. Thunderbolt is a vehicle for third parties in which Blackmagic, Matrox, AJA, LaCie, Pegasus, Sonnet and others are jumping on.

It's a successful business model regardless of how you FEEL about it.
If Apple meets my business needs that's a FINANCIAL decision.



Posts IndexRead Thread
Reply   Like  
Share on Facebook


Current Message Thread:




LOGIN TO REPLY



FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINESTOCKYARDVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2013 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]