Re: Dear FCPX team,

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: Dear FCPX team,
by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:27:39 pm

[Oliver Peters] "Because Apple has now demonstrated that they will only integrate "hooks" for external developers to use, rather than writing those modules themselves. View it in the same context as a plug-in."

I'm sure there's a good reason for this but as time continues to slip by I really can't for the life of me see what that reason could be.

In fact, I have only two words for Apple on this subject right now ...

Automatic Duck.

The first third party partner fell at the first hurdle - how well does that bode for the future?

Simon Ubsdell
Director/Editor/Writer
http://www.tokyo-uk.com

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

Dear FCPX team, by Luke Hale on Oct 13, 2011 at 4:22:19 pm
- Re: Dear FCPX team, by Paul Jay on Oct 13, 2011 at 5:40:15 pm
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Morten Ranmar on Oct 13, 2011 at 5:47:23 pm
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 5:47:27 pm
    - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Bill Hall on Oct 13, 2011 at 6:55:36 pm
      - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Oliver Peters on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:04:28 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:27:39 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:37:13 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:58:54 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:01:41 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Glen Hurd on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:44:19 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Mitch Ives on Oct 13, 2011 at 10:36:01 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Benjamin Mullins on Oct 14, 2011 at 3:15:49 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 6:11:39 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Bill Davis on Oct 16, 2011 at 9:44:51 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 17, 2011 at 2:32:02 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by TImothy Auld on Oct 16, 2011 at 9:55:15 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 17, 2011 at 2:45:14 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Oliver Peters on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:30:27 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:37:52 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Walter Soyka on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:43:10 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:47:18 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Oliver Peters on Oct 13, 2011 at 11:12:23 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 2:09:03 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Walter Soyka on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:02:35 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:10:45 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Oliver Peters on Oct 13, 2011 at 11:07:55 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Geert van den Berg on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:29:42 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:37:53 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Gerald Baria on Oct 14, 2011 at 12:17:58 am
- Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jim Glickert on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:06:18 pm
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Greg Burke on Oct 14, 2011 at 3:05:40 am
    - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Bill Hall on Oct 14, 2011 at 12:39:41 pm
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Chris Harlan on Oct 17, 2011 at 6:14:28 am
- Re: Dear FCPX team, by Mark Palmos on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:40:34 am
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Luke Hale on Oct 17, 2011 at 7:42:37 pm
    - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 17, 2011 at 8:15:55 pm


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • FEATURES • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS