Re: It's working now!

actually dearest david i never got teased in school..there were 3 other guys named kim in my school...one of them a football player, and the other one a great guitar player. did you get teased for your name? what a stupid question....is that the best you got? i was glad to see that other people agreed with me on challenging your post of the xml functions in FCPX. if you're gonna be a journalist just give fair and accurate reporting. imagine a car reviewer doing a story on some new model and he craps all over it because he couldn't turn off the wipers. you are a respected member of this forum...i won't doubt that, but you have to be fair in what you say. a lot of people look to you for advice. also a lot of what happens with fcpx being supported rests on apple's plans for the future. as i've mentioned many times, if you don't like it don't buy it, but making negative comments on a product we all know is far from finished in no way helps anyone. i look forward to the day when fcpx is a stable well running and mature bit of software.....remember the first version of mac osx...what a piece of garbage but we all lived with it and it has become a world class operating system. maybe fcpx will never regain its former glory, but lets at least give it a chance. can we kiss and make up now?