SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
LIBRARY
PODCASTS
BLOGS
MAGAZINE
SERVICES
NEWSLETTERS
NEWS
STORE
EVENTS
FORUMS:
list
list (w/ descriptions)
archive
tags
search
Re: omni-directional lavs
Cow Forums
:
Audio Professionals
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Return to Posts Index
•
Read Entire Thread
•
Reply To This Post
Re: omni-directional lavs
by
Danny Grizzle
on Jul 20, 2008 at 7:09:24 pm
I only buy omni lavaliers. You get some degree of directionality from lav placement, usually a person's body. Close placement is the only reason lav mics exist. An omni mic worked close always beats a shotgun worked too far away. In other words, hyper cardiods exist only for situations where close mic placement is not possible.
The physics of sound dictate that every time you double the distance from sound source to mic, the level is not half as much, but one fourth. Conversely, if you can halve the distance between mic and source, you quadruple the signal.
This is the exact reason why mics used in high ambient noise environments such as aviation use boom mics to place the mic directly in front of the mouth. Up close, small distances dramatically change the ratio of wanted vs. unwanted sound.
All this means, that at close distances such as lavalier mic placement, directionality becomes much less important, because you are by definition working with a much higher signal-to-noise ratio from the get-go.
Whenever circumstances permit, omni mics almost always sound better than directional mics. Since most production audio takes place in the real world, usually not on sound stages and the studio, cardiod mics tend to be the workhorse in most sound guy's kit. But don't take this to mean they are the best mic in all situations and applications. Lavaliers are the exception, where an omni pattern is almost always better than cardiod.
Some manufacturers make directional lavaliers, and there may be special applications where they are useful. But a quality omni lav is certainly your first choice. I've never tried a directional lavalier, but I have read that they are problematic for use with body packs and talent. They are small, hard to keep positioned correctly, and vulnerable to wide swings in sound quality as talent moves, turns their head, etc.
BTW - You've seen the TV commercials with Vince selling ShamWow towels. His boom mic is totally unnecessary, a practical prop. It does create the trade show floor ambiance of a barker working his demo. Boom mics can be useful in sound reinforcement applications and concerts, where high volume levels would otherwise lead to feedback amplification.
Return to Posts Index
•
Read Entire Thread
•
Reply To This Post
Current Message Thread:
omni-directional lavs
by stan welks on Jul 20, 2008 at 6:17:26 pm
Re: omni-directional lavs
by Ty Ford on Jul 20, 2008 at 7:01:21 pm
Re: omni-directional lavs
by stan welks on Jul 21, 2008 at 1:54:47 am
Re: omni-directional lavs
by Ty Ford on Jul 21, 2008 at 3:43:13 am
Re: omni-directional lavs
by Danny Grizzle on Jul 20, 2008 at 7:09:24 pm
Re: omni-directional lavs
by Rodney Morris on Jul 22, 2008 at 12:17:21 am
Note:
If you are a registered user and you
do not
see your name and email in the two respective fields above, you may reset your account cookies by clicking
here
. Your post
will not be accepted
if the name and email provided above are not currently registered in our database.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message
Note:
The following characters are HTML command characters, and may cause parts of your post to disappear, if not used correctly: < > &. To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key. For more on how to post,
click here
.
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
LIBRARY
•
PODCASTS
•
BLOGS
•
MAGAZINE
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTERS
•
NEWS
•
STORE
•
EVENTS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]