Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US :: FAQ
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
FORUMS:listlist (w/ descriptions)archivetagssearchhall of famerecent posts

Re: Real World Editing: From Avid to FCP and Back Again

COW Forums : Art of the Edit

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Share on Facebook
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Kevin MonahanRe: Real World Editing: From Avid to FCP and Back Again
by on Jan 13, 2012 at 9:27:49 pm

[Shane Ross] "Premiere is actually worse than FCP when it comes to multiple editor workflows and offline/online editing. BMP has very specific needs, and those include converting the footage to a low data rate "offline resolution" codec, and the converting only what is used in the cuts to full res during the online phase. Premiere doesn't do that...it doesn't have it's own codecs...no offline codec, no online codec. It deals with footage natively. And even natively the file sizes and data rates are too big."

We know that we have some improvement to do in multiple editor workflows. That said, we have customers all over the world editing in shared project environments, some are quite large broadcast enterprises with many more seats than BMP. http://www.adobe.com/solutions/broadcasting.html

Best of luck to Mark in his new post environment. Having toured there, I am quite sure they'll still be using Adobe tools in their workflow.

Kevin Monahan
Sr. Content and Community Lead
Adobe After Effects
Adobe Premiere Pro
Adobe Systems, Inc.
Follow Me on Twitter!


Posts IndexRead Thread
Reply   Like  
+1
Share on Facebook


Current Message Thread:




LOGIN TO REPLY



FORUMSTUTORIALSFEATURESVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2014 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]