SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
FORUMS:
list
list (w/ descriptions)
archive
tags
search
hall of fame
recent posts
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
COW Forums
:
DSLR Video
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by
Richard Harrington
on Nov 5, 2010 at 3:43:41 am
To further explain Native Editing
1. In FCP... can import H.264 straight and do a cut down to determine which soundbites you need, b-Roll, etc. Assembly sequences. You can then use media manager on this.
2. In Premiere Pro, Avid MC5, Sony Vegas – You can import and edit material WITHOUT transcoding. You can work with the material in a more robust color space, add effects, etc.
Personally, I do #2... working in Premiere Pro for DSPr material. I then send out an FCP sequence with media (via XML export) and go to Apple Color at 422 if needed. Sometimes we just Color Correct with Premiere Pro or Color Finesse in AE.
As of this writing... the ability to record out the HDMI port is not really there, so writing 4:2:0 then trying to bump it up to a beefier format is really not going to go very far.
If you were shooting a photo as a JPEG, then you converted to a Photoshop or DNG, you just wouldn't get the same flexibility as shooting in a camera raw format. I'm not saying to master back to H.264 (which would be like opening a JPEG and saving a JPEGH out – more compression than wanted).
I hope this gives clarity... Lance feel free to start insulting me again.
Richard M. Harrington, PMP
Author: From Still to Motion, Video Made on a Mac, Photoshop for Video, Understanding Adobe Photoshop, Final Cut Studio On the Spot and Motion Graphics with Adobe Creative Suite 5 Studio Techniques
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Omar Itani on Nov 2, 2010 at 4:26:31 am
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Richard Harrington on Nov 2, 2010 at 12:40:51 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Omar Itani on Nov 2, 2010 at 1:16:31 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Lance Bachelder on Nov 2, 2010 at 6:50:38 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Omar Itani on Nov 2, 2010 at 6:52:45 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Lance Bachelder on Nov 2, 2010 at 7:02:32 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Omar Itani on Nov 2, 2010 at 7:04:48 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Richard van den Boogaard on Nov 4, 2010 at 8:56:06 am
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Richard Harrington on Nov 4, 2010 at 1:25:38 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Lance Bachelder on Nov 4, 2010 at 5:28:27 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Richard Harrington on Nov 5, 2010 at 3:32:34 am
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Lance Bachelder on Nov 5, 2010 at 6:21:39 am
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Richard Harrington on Nov 5, 2010 at 1:32:54 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Richard Harrington on Nov 5, 2010 at 2:44:15 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by gary adcock on Nov 5, 2010 at 5:37:56 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Ashish Ranglani on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:18:57 am
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Richard Harrington on Nov 5, 2010 at 3:43:41 am
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Stephen Martin on Nov 5, 2010 at 7:52:46 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Robbie Carman on Nov 5, 2010 at 8:34:28 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Garrett Gibbons on Nov 5, 2010 at 10:10:09 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by gary adcock on Nov 6, 2010 at 1:23:07 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Phil Kennedy on Nov 8, 2010 at 4:06:16 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Richard Harrington on Nov 8, 2010 at 6:21:17 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Phil Kennedy on Nov 8, 2010 at 6:42:43 pm
Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444
by Ashish Ranglani on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:34:08 am
Re: Richard, Lance, Robbie, Gary, Stephen, and everyone else!
by Omar Itani on Nov 9, 2010 at 12:39:06 am
Re: Richard, Lance, Robbie, Gary, Stephen, and everyone else!
by Bryan Mailer on Nov 28, 2012 at 8:49:49 am
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]