SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
TRAINING
VIDEOS - REELS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
FORUMS:
list
list (w/ descriptions)
archive
tags
search
hall of fame
recent posts
Re: Adrift - UW conservation film
Cow Forums
:
Art of the Edit
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Adrift - UW conservation film
by
Timothy J. Allen
on Nov 18, 2008 at 10:53:30 pm
Very nice visuals! That's both a beautiful and a disturbing piece. As TJ mentioned, I think the sound design could a bit of attention. You did such a great job with the visuals, I'd hate to see (or in this case hear) the audio detract from them.
Music tells us how we should feel about what we are seeing and you selected a nice background of sound that does that, but another 15 minutes concentrating on sound would really help.
For instance, at 1:32, the audio cut is very abrupt and still in the middle of a musical phrase, which is probably intended to give the viewer a sense of displacement or a sudden jarring effect. But, since it has no "exclamation point", such as a cymbal crash or big sound at the end, it sounds like a mistake in the edit. If you are going to switch gears suddenly and don't want to end with a big sound, you should still pay attention to the musical crescendo so that when you take the sound away suddenly your intent is clear.
I know that natural sound may be impossible to get while shooting some of this footage, but it would add some power if we could hear the sickening sound of fish flapping in the buckets or (most especially) the sound of the explosion at 3:45. If I didn't have that sound at 3:45, I'd foley something in to give it that effect.
I'd also agree that you could trim this down to about half the length and be just as effective. I don't know if you had to hit a target time, but as much as I liked seeing the beautiful footage, it did go a little long for the small screen. I imagine that if I saw this projected on a 12 foot high screen, I wouldn't have that opinion.
Just wondering… Is the text “ghost’s” onscreen at 2:00 referencing a possessive from of the word “ghost” or should it read “ghosts”?
Nice composite work, by the way. Very good overall!
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Current Message Thread:
Adrift - UW conservation film
by Sri JIva Southall on Nov 11, 2008 at 1:02:02 am
Re: Adrift - UW conservation film
by TJ McCormick on Nov 11, 2008 at 10:15:26 pm
Re: Adrift - UW conservation film
by Sri JIva Southall on Nov 12, 2008 at 1:28:09 am
Re: Adrift - UW conservation film
by Charlie King on Nov 12, 2008 at 9:12:10 pm
Re: Adrift - UW conservation film
by Sri JIva Southall on Nov 13, 2008 at 1:09:16 am
Re: Adrift - UW conservation film
by Mike Cohen on Nov 18, 2008 at 5:13:05 am
Re: Adrift - UW conservation film
by Timothy J. Allen on Nov 18, 2008 at 10:53:30 pm
Re: Adrift - UW conservation film
by Sri JIva Southall on Nov 20, 2008 at 1:58:26 am
Related Tags:
Film
Note:
If you are a registered user please
click here to login
before posting.
Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click
here
if you do not have an account.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message:
Note:
The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key.
Read more...
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
TRAINING
•
VIDEOS - REELS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]