SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
FORUMS:
list
list (w/ descriptions)
archive
tags
search
hall of fame
recent posts
Re: re: broadcasting "in hd"
COW Forums
:
Telestream Wirecast
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: re: broadcasting "in hd"
by
Craig Seeman
on Sep 24, 2009 at 8:53:05 pm
1280x720 at 1500kbps = HD.
You would NOT want to send HD to the computer to broadcast in SD. You're asking the computer to use a lot of CPU to downrez, decode, encode. If doing SD broadcast you want to downrez BEFORE the signal hits the computer.
HD streaming is very possible at 720 and people using Watershed and Livestream Pro are doing it (amongst others).
Granted not everyone can view 1500kbps but certainly someone with a cable modem or very fast DSL can. By comparison YouTube HD progressive download is about 2000kbps and Vimeo is around 1600kbps last I checked so the quality at 720 at 1500kbps is OK.
BTW HDV as you might guess is a real challenge to decode and encode live to 720 at 1500kbps but it can be done if you're only using 1 camera. I've done it on my MacPro.
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
re: broadcasting "in hd"
by jesse miller on Sep 24, 2009 at 8:45:44 pm
Re: re: broadcasting "in hd"
by Craig Seeman on Sep 24, 2009 at 8:53:05 pm
Re: re: broadcasting "in hd"
by Scot Lenter on Sep 24, 2009 at 8:56:16 pm
Re: re: broadcasting "in hd"
by jesse miller on Sep 24, 2009 at 10:35:35 pm
Re: re: broadcasting "in hd"
by Craig Seeman on Sep 24, 2009 at 11:21:20 pm
Re: re: broadcasting "in hd"
by Jeff Mack on Sep 26, 2009 at 7:45:16 pm
Re: re: broadcasting "in hd"
by Craig Seeman on Sep 26, 2009 at 8:10:44 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]