SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
DVDs
BOOKS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
RED CAMERA:
Red Camera Forum
Red Camera Tutorials / Articles
HD Tutorials
HD High-End Forum
Re: Why 4k?
Cow Forums
:
RED Camera
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Why 4k?
by
Graeme Nattress
on Jan 7, 2008 at 3:16:22 pm
Typically, taking into account bayer pattern and optical low pass filter (you do need one on your camera, be it 3 chip and prism or single chip to avoid the grossest nasties of aliasing) you typically measure about 70% of the linear pixel dimension. However, I'm measuring nearly 80% now, which is very good. I find it funny when you read that some affordable HD cameras measure 1000 lines per picture height, when their sensors are just 1080 pixels high. Then you look at a test chart and see the aliasing in the top frequency bands and understand why.... :-)
OLPFs have a slow roll-off of high frequencies, so they cannot work like a brick wall filter that you'd design in electronics. Lack of negative light stops us designing OLPFs like that :-) That means to get good attenuation for the high frequencies, you've got to bring them in early. However, that's better than the gross aliasing you see in more affordable single and 3 chip cameras.
Of course, the above could apply to a DSLR just as much to RED.
Graeme
- www.nattress.com - Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Current Message Thread:
Why 4k?
by Alex Huber on Jan 3, 2008 at 4:07:23 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 3, 2008 at 7:09:00 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Todd at Fantastic Plastic on Jan 3, 2008 at 8:14:54 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Graeme Nattress on Jan 3, 2008 at 8:28:01 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by gary adcock on Jan 3, 2008 at 11:00:18 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Alex Huber on Jan 3, 2008 at 11:49:14 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 4, 2008 at 2:49:57 am
Re: Why 4k?
by gary adcock on Jan 4, 2008 at 10:03:33 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Steve Wargo on Jan 4, 2008 at 5:32:07 am
Re: Why 4k?
by Ramona Howard on Jan 5, 2008 at 5:26:51 am
Re: Why 4k?
by ken hon on Jan 5, 2008 at 3:17:27 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Todd at Fantastic Plastic on Jan 5, 2008 at 5:26:07 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Alex Huber on Jan 5, 2008 at 6:56:47 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 5, 2008 at 7:53:05 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Todd at Fantastic Plastic on Jan 5, 2008 at 9:50:30 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Steve Wargo on Jan 5, 2008 at 5:45:29 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Barend Onneweer on Jan 5, 2008 at 7:52:07 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Graeme Nattress on Jan 7, 2008 at 3:16:22 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Ramona Howard on Jan 9, 2008 at 7:51:58 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Barend Onneweer on Jan 9, 2008 at 9:21:50 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Graeme Nattress on Jan 9, 2008 at 9:35:27 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Ramona Howard on Jan 9, 2008 at 10:10:24 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by gary adcock on Jan 5, 2008 at 9:09:44 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Aaron zander on Jan 7, 2008 at 5:24:21 am
Re: Why 4k?
by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 7, 2008 at 2:58:33 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Todd at Fantastic Plastic on Jan 7, 2008 at 5:58:57 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 7, 2008 at 6:28:18 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Aaron zander on Jan 8, 2008 at 3:30:55 am
Note:
If you are a registered user please
click here to login
before posting.
Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click
here
if you do not have an account.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message:
Note:
The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key.
Read more...
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
DVDs
•
BOOKS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]