SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
DVDs
BOOKS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
RED CAMERA:
Red Camera Forum
Red Camera Tutorials / Articles
HD Tutorials
HD High-End Forum
Re: Why 4k?
Cow Forums
:
RED Camera
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Why 4k?
by
Steve Wargo
on Jan 5, 2008 at 5:45:29 pm
[Ramona Howard]
"This is still sudo 4K, not true 4K isn't it?."
I was told by a very technically savvy engineer that the recorded image is 2.7k. This information came from someone at a major rental house from tests that they did while evaluating the Red camera. He obviously does not want to be named because if he did, he would have done so already. He did, however, say that they figured that the HD-SDI port would provide a better count.
Please do not jump all over me for this. I am merely passing on the word. But hey, 2.7 is still a very good number. It's just not 4k to the cards, according to him.
So, how does one go about testing this? I was unable to ask this question at that time. When we test footage, I hand it to a friend that has a Flame and he goes in and looks at the pixels.
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Current Message Thread:
Why 4k?
by Alex Huber on Jan 3, 2008 at 4:07:23 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 3, 2008 at 7:09:00 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Todd at Fantastic Plastic on Jan 3, 2008 at 8:14:54 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Graeme Nattress on Jan 3, 2008 at 8:28:01 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by gary adcock on Jan 3, 2008 at 11:00:18 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Alex Huber on Jan 3, 2008 at 11:49:14 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 4, 2008 at 2:49:57 am
Re: Why 4k?
by gary adcock on Jan 4, 2008 at 10:03:33 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Steve Wargo on Jan 4, 2008 at 5:32:07 am
Re: Why 4k?
by Ramona Howard on Jan 5, 2008 at 5:26:51 am
Re: Why 4k?
by ken hon on Jan 5, 2008 at 3:17:27 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Todd at Fantastic Plastic on Jan 5, 2008 at 5:26:07 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Alex Huber on Jan 5, 2008 at 6:56:47 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 5, 2008 at 7:53:05 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Todd at Fantastic Plastic on Jan 5, 2008 at 9:50:30 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Steve Wargo on Jan 5, 2008 at 5:45:29 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Barend Onneweer on Jan 5, 2008 at 7:52:07 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Graeme Nattress on Jan 7, 2008 at 3:16:22 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Ramona Howard on Jan 9, 2008 at 7:51:58 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Barend Onneweer on Jan 9, 2008 at 9:21:50 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Graeme Nattress on Jan 9, 2008 at 9:35:27 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Ramona Howard on Jan 9, 2008 at 10:10:24 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by gary adcock on Jan 5, 2008 at 9:09:44 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Aaron zander on Jan 7, 2008 at 5:24:21 am
Re: Why 4k?
by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 7, 2008 at 2:58:33 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Todd at Fantastic Plastic on Jan 7, 2008 at 5:58:57 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 7, 2008 at 6:28:18 pm
Re: Why 4k?
by Aaron zander on Jan 8, 2008 at 3:30:55 am
Note:
If you are a registered user please
click here to login
before posting.
Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click
here
if you do not have an account.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message:
Note:
The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key.
Read more...
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
DVDs
•
BOOKS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]