Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
FORUMS:listlist (w/ descriptions)archivetagssearchhall of famerecent posts

Re: H.264 vs x264

COW Forums : Apple iPhone

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Share on Facebook
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Daniel LowRe: H.264 vs x264
by on Jan 15, 2010 at 8:17:55 pm

x264 is Open source, where as H.264 is commercially licensed by the MPEG LA.

No commercial software can use x264 without itself becoming Open source.

x264 is considered the best out there but you have to be something of an expert in the coding parameters to get the best out of it, despite there being a number of decent front end GUIs for it.

Unless you are pushing the extremes of low bitrates with complex material, you find there's not much in it between x264 and the better codecs from the likes of Main Concept and Dicas.

Remember there's more to encoding/transcoding than the codec, there's also scaling, deinterlacing, colour space conversion and so on. Those are handled by the rest of the compression software

There is also of course Ateme, which although of great visual quality, is stupidly expensive and the software was clearly designed by blind alligator (or similar)

__________________________________________________________________
"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance."
Steve Ballmer To USA Today: 30 April 2007


Posts IndexRead Thread
Reply   Like  
Share on Facebook


Current Message Thread:




LOGIN TO REPLY



FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINESTOCKYARDVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2013 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]