SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
TRAINING
VIDEOS - REELS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
ADOBE AFTER EFFECTS:
Home
Forum
Basics
Expressions
Tutorials
Podcasts
Motion Graphics
Training
Cinema 4D
FAQ
Re: Mac Pro 3.0 or 3.2 (sorry if this has been asked)
Cow Forums
:
Adobe After Effects
FAQ
•
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Mac Pro 3.0 or 3.2 (sorry if this has been asked)
by
Kevin Camp
on Oct 1, 2008 at 9:26:18 pm
it depends a little bit on what you'll be working with... i think a single stream of uncompressed hd is around 160mb/sec... that is pretty easy to achieve, but that would be the flat out minimum to capture a single stream of hd.
if you were editing uncompressed hd, you would need double that to get realtime playback of something as simple as a crossfade between 2 clips.
in compositing you may composite several clips together, so it kind of depends on what you need... i guess if i had to give a target, 320mb/sec minimum would probably be a decent place to start. 320mb/sec is not too hard achieve and should give you a pretty wide array of choices. and, if you are working in hd, quite a bit of your footage will probably be compressed, and that will have a much lighter data rate.
Kevin Camp
Senior Designer
KCPQ, KMYQ & KRCW
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Current Message Thread:
Mac Pro 3.0 or 3.2 (sorry if this has been asked)
by Robert Combs on Sep 28, 2008 at 2:57:44 pm
Re: Mac Pro 3.0 or 3.2 (sorry if this has been asked)
by Jan Sherlink on Sep 28, 2008 at 8:08:44 pm
Re: Mac Pro 3.0 or 3.2 (sorry if this has been asked)
by Kevin Camp on Sep 29, 2008 at 4:10:28 pm
Re: Mac Pro 3.0 or 3.2 (sorry if this has been asked)
by Robert Combs on Oct 1, 2008 at 2:51:14 pm
Re: Mac Pro 3.0 or 3.2 (sorry if this has been asked)
by Jan Sherlink on Oct 1, 2008 at 3:25:00 pm
Re: Mac Pro 3.0 or 3.2 (sorry if this has been asked)
by Kevin Camp on Oct 1, 2008 at 5:24:34 pm
Re: Mac Pro 3.0 or 3.2 (sorry if this has been asked)
by Robert Combs on Oct 1, 2008 at 7:39:10 pm
Re: Mac Pro 3.0 or 3.2 (sorry if this has been asked)
by Kevin Camp on Oct 1, 2008 at 9:26:18 pm
Re: Mac Pro 3.0 or 3.2 (sorry if this has been asked)
by Robert Combs on Oct 3, 2008 at 3:39:21 pm
Re: Mac Pro 3.0 or 3.2 (sorry if this has been asked)
by Jan Sherlink on Oct 4, 2008 at 8:04:38 am
Re: Mac Pro 3.0 or 3.2 (sorry if this has been asked)
by Robert Combs on Oct 9, 2008 at 3:19:47 pm
Note:
If you are a registered user please
click here to login
before posting.
Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click
here
if you do not have an account.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message:
Note:
The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key.
Read more...
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
TRAINING
•
VIDEOS - REELS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]