Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important?


	Cow Forums : Panasonic HVX - HPX (P2) VIEW POSTS • ADD A NEW POST • SEARCH • CHANGE FORUM

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important?
by Jesse Rosen on Jul 9, 2008 at 1:50:39 am

Just a warning about Retrospect: in the past (haven't re-tested in the past year or so) Retrospect would not back up an empty folder. This would play havoc with some implementations of P2 workflow. I'd highly recommend BRU instead, or go for the network drives. Actually, there are some issues to be aware of with the network drives as well - there are certain characters that aren't compatible with its internal file system. Use a real FTP client to backup, not the built-in JAVA-based one - you don't get good error messages with it.

--
Jesse Rosen
Director of Technical Development
Abel Cine Tech, Inc.
www.bustedskull.com

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Current Message Thread:

Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Bob Cole on Jul 7, 2008 at 6:24:34 pm
- Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Shane Ross on Jul 7, 2008 at 9:04:19 pm
- Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Noah Kadner on Jul 7, 2008 at 10:43:09 pm
- Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Helmut Kobler on Jul 7, 2008 at 10:46:22 pm
  - Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Doug Nichol on Jul 8, 2008 at 5:00:58 am
    - Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Bob Cole on Jul 8, 2008 at 9:55:27 am
      - Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Doug Nichol on Jul 8, 2008 at 3:38:15 pm
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 8, 2008 at 9:48:16 pm
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Jesse Rosen on Jul 9, 2008 at 1:50:39 am
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Doug Nichol on Jul 9, 2008 at 3:48:55 am
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Doug Nichol on Jul 9, 2008 at 3:56:00 am
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Lars Wikstrom on Jul 9, 2008 at 9:00:04 pm
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Shaun Harrison on Mar 24, 2009 at 8:12:00 pm
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Doug Nichol on Jul 10, 2008 at 9:43:16 pm
- Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Matthew Romanis on Jul 12, 2008 at 12:40:34 am
  - Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Glenn Jones on Oct 20, 2008 at 1:37:18 pm

Note: If you are a registered user please click here to login before posting.

Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click here if you do not have an account.

Name

E-Mail Address

Subject

E-Mail me when someone responds

Just This Message

Entire Thread

None

Message:

Note: The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key. Read more...

Add your message signature

Note: By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's Code of Conduct.