Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important?

COW Forums : Panasonic HVX - HPX (P2)

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important?
by Doug Nichol on Jul 8, 2008 at 3:38:15 pm

I have a SCSI card that I bought from ATTO to hook the LTO3 drive to my MacPro (Intel). I also have an XServe Raid hooked up through the Fiber Channel card so that works for my storage. If you are a facility with multiple edit bays then obviously it's better to spend the money for the network enabled MXF drive, but if you just have one edit system you can make the LTO-3 HH work fine - it's really fast as well. You need to but the program Retrospect ($100) to make the Quantum drive work - you use Retrospect to make your back-ups.
Good luck.
Doug

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Bob Cole on Jul 7, 2008 at 6:24:34 pm
- Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Shane Ross on Jul 7, 2008 at 9:04:19 pm
- Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Noah Kadner on Jul 7, 2008 at 10:43:09 pm
- Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Helmut Kobler on Jul 7, 2008 at 10:46:22 pm
  - Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Doug Nichol on Jul 8, 2008 at 5:00:58 am
    - Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Bob Cole on Jul 8, 2008 at 9:55:27 am
      - Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Doug Nichol on Jul 8, 2008 at 3:38:15 pm
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 8, 2008 at 9:48:16 pm
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Jesse Rosen on Jul 9, 2008 at 1:50:39 am
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Doug Nichol on Jul 9, 2008 at 3:48:55 am
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Doug Nichol on Jul 9, 2008 at 3:56:00 am
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Lars Wikstrom on Jul 9, 2008 at 9:00:04 pm
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Shaun Harrison on Mar 24, 2009 at 8:12:00 pm
        Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Doug Nichol on Jul 10, 2008 at 9:43:16 pm
- Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Matthew Romanis on Jul 12, 2008 at 12:40:34 am
  - Re: Archiving: LTO-3a vs. the cheaper spread: MXF important? by Glenn Jones on Oct 20, 2008 at 1:37:18 pm


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS